Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
Answer:
The Hawthorne Effect
Explanation:
The Hawthorne effect (also referred to as the observer effect) explains that individuals modify an aspect of their behavior in response to their knowledge of being observed. In this study students changed their eating place during the observation period.
Answer:
Buddhism and Christianity
Explanation:
The basic doctrines of early Buddhism, which remain common to all Buddhism, include the four noble truths : existence is suffering (dukkha); suffering has a cause, namely craving and attachment (trishna); there is a cessation of suffering, which is nirvana; and there is a path to the cessation of suffering and Christians is Jesus and god
Answer:
The Israelites rebelled against the Assyrian Empire and reunited with Judah.
Explanation:
