Yes i am pretty sure he did because he wanted to spread more power out to the people
hope this helps
When businesses compete everything is great. Eventually one of the businesses in a field gets bigger. And bigger. And bigger. It buys out it's competitors. It monopolizes it's niche filed, sometimes even spreading to others.<span>Since money will no longer be used, people will have access to all of the resources they need, and there will no longer be a state to protect the capitalist's private property, I find it extremely unlikely that a worker would want to exchange his labor for a wage. The way I see it, it would be like playing pretend. The situation would be similar to if a group of people in the United States declared their friend Tim the king of Arkansas.</span>
Finally, and most controversially, a Fugitive Slave<span> Law</span>was<span> passed, requiring northerners to return runaway</span>slaves<span> to their owners under penalty of law. The</span>Compromise of 1850<span> overturned the Missouri</span>Compromise<span> and left the overall issue of </span>slavery unsettled<span>.</span>
The correct answer is William T. Sherman.
Sherman was responsible for marching troops through the heart of the traitorous Southern States and for capturing Atlanta.
Sherman's March to the Sea was brilliant in that he burned the South as he went while also dodging the Southern Army. He knew that his job was to destroy the Southern economy and was not concerned with fighting the traitorous rebel army.
Answer:
impossible
Explanation:
Lincoln didn't want states to secede.
