Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
They don't look alike
Answer:
B&C: tan F=0.0833 & tan H=12.0000
Step-by-step explanation:
The tangent relationship is always opposite/adjacent.
When F is the reference angle, side GH (1) is the opposite side and side FG (12) is the adjacent.
1/12 is 0.0833
When H is the reference angle, FG (12) is the opposite and GH (1) is the adjacent.
12/1 is 12.
Not quite understand the question. We assume that the issue of ratios of numbers of 800 and 8000.
Then 800 is one-tenth of the 8,000 800 other words is 10% of 8000.
Conversely, 8000 it ten times at 800 and 1000% of 800.
Answer:
a
Step-by-step explanation:
one of the vertexes have a different rotation size than the other
also i used a protractor
( plz mark me as brainliest, that would be most appreciated! )
The confidence level C and the significance level alpha are linked through the equation
alpha = 1-C
So for instance, if the confidence level is C = 95% = 0.95 then alpha is
alpha = 1-C
alpha = 1-0.95
alpha = 0.05
meaning we have a 5% significance level. The larger C gets, the smaller alpha gets and vice versa. It turns out that 0 < C < 1 and also 0 < alpha < 1.
The closer C gets to 1, the alpha value gets closer to 0. The smaller alpha gets, the harder it is to reject the null. Why is that? If we have a fixed p value, say p = 0.02 then we reject the null if alpha > pvalue. But we fail to reject the null when alpha < pvalue. For very small alpha values, we're going to fail to reject H0 no matter how small the pvalue is. The pvalue would have to be really small for H0 to be rejected.
In short, I'm saying that if the confidence level is high, then the chance of rejecting the null hypothesis is low (or rare)
This is why the answer is choice A
