1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnesinka [82]
3 years ago
7

Emphasis the human body

History
1 answer:
77julia77 [94]3 years ago
3 0
Please explain more
You might be interested in
21) In what condition did U.S. troops find the Allies upon arriving in Europe in 1917? (WW1)
Ivahew [28]
C: The allies were near defeat
5 0
4 years ago
Populism had a lasting effect on
motikmotik
<h2>Populism Effect </h2>

Populism had a lasting effect on the style of politics in the United States. Populism leads to a variety of strategies which highlight the part of the people and usually place this group versus the elite in politics.

The Populist movement was a sedition by growers in the South and Midwest versus the Republican and Constitutional Affairs for neglecting their concerns and problems.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think a largfhe gdp indicates an overall healthy economy
vladimir1956 [14]
Yes, the growth domestic product measures the amount of goods and services the United States buys and sells as a nation. Therefore a large GDP means the United States economy is expanding which provides lots of economic opportunity for our citizens.
5 0
4 years ago
Judges have received a series of cost of living adjustment (COLA) denials over the past few decades, affecting their salaries.
iVinArrow [24]

The statement is TRUE.

The Ethics Reform Act of 1989, guaranteed automatic cost of living adjusments (known as "COLAs") to protect the salaries of judges against inflation. This also applied to other areas of federal employment.  Pay raises, however, could be denied if the President declared national emergency or some serious economic crisis were to generate a collapse.

Despite these promises, Congress refused on several occasions throughout the past decades to raise judges' salaries, even on occasions where other federal employees were benefited by COLAs.

This led to a series of court fights that culminated with the authority given to Congress to take away promised pay raises from judges any time before they'd taken formal effect. What this means is that the Constitution will only protect judges’ pay that has been “due and payable". The review of this ruling was denied by the Supreme Court for several years.  However, Congress did end up voting to allow an increment of pay for judges later on (but not in 2007 or 2010, to cite some more examples of recent denials).


Hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is this statement true or false?
Dmitry [639]
True. This answer is true
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Hi every one i need elp
    7·1 answer
  • What does the preamble say about the power of government? Select all that apply. If the government abuses its power, people’s na
    12·2 answers
  • The differences in culture and government described in the chart led to which of the following?
    5·1 answer
  • Question 8
    7·1 answer
  • What are the three main ideas england used in shaping the colonial government
    13·1 answer
  • What did the roles of noblewomen compare to those of knights
    12·1 answer
  • Several forensic anthropologists have dealt with the aftermath of Argentina’s "Dirty War" (1970s and 1980s) during which many
    13·1 answer
  • Which nationality did Alexander the Great claim to be?
    13·2 answers
  • Using the passage above, which choice below was the most important reason for annexing Hawaii?
    11·1 answer
  • This changes on a daily basis.<br> A. Weather B. Climate C. Seasons
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!