Answer:
1) where do you live?
2) Do you enjoy history lessons?
3) what sports do you and your friends play?
4) where does your father work?
5) does your mother drive a car?
1) I live in (pon donde vives)
2) I don't enjoy history lessons
3) Me and my friends play (el deporte que juegas con tus amigos)
4) My father works in (donde trabaja tu papa)
5) My mother does drive a car
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
you find all the answers out of text
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
