Answer:
They both may set time limits.
Explanation:
Filibuster is procedure in which the government officials agree to have unlimited debate. Only the senates can have a filibuster, the house of representative can't do it. This eliminate option a.
in order to conduct their business, Senate need 51% of members present (the majority). But, the house only require 20% (not a majority). This eliminate option B.
Cloture is a procedure to end every debate with a vote for a certain decision. Only senate has cloture, House of Representative does not have it. This eliminate option D.
Are there answer choices for this?
they believe that when they died their spiritual body would continue to exist in an afterlife very similar to their living world
An attempt to initiate or include someone in a group through the use of physical, emotional, or psychological abuse is an act of Harassment.
Harassment is any unwanted behavior, physical or verbal, that makes a reasonable person feel uncomfortable, humiliated, or mentally distressed. Harassment affects a person mentally, physically or emotionally.
Examples of harassment include offensive or bad jokes, racial or ethnic talk, pressure for dates or sexual favors, unwelcome comments about a person's religion or religious garments, cartoons or pictures.
You can report harassment to the police. They can charge someone with criminal harassment if the person has harassed you more than once. the harassment made you feel distressed or alarmed.
To learn more about Harassment, here
brainly.com/question/6659394
#SPJ4
Answer:
Landscape
Explanation:
Daoism is a religious tradition within Chinese and Japanese culture which specifically emphasizes living in harmony with your surroundings. According to my research on Daoism, I can say that based on the information provided within the question it is Landscape Paintings which draw inspiration from the beliefs of Daoism.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
judicial activism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this decision is an example of judicial activism. This term refers to a court ruling that is suspected of having been made on the basis of a personal opinion as opposed to an actual existing law. Such as in this case since the court made a ruling on something that is not not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.
