Answer:
<u>1. archetype.</u>
<u>2. foreshadowing.</u>
<u>3. rhetoric</u>
<u>4. Satire</u>
<u>6. reader</u>
Explanation:
1. Archetype characters refer to characters that reoccur in other stories because of the perceived place they have in our imagination.
2. Foreshadowing employs the use of giving a pinch of info about what's going to happen later. In other words, it is like a hint.
3. Rhetoric, on the other hand, refers to the type of expression or language chosen by an author so as to create an effect on the minds of readers and listeners.
4. Satire rightly is the use of humor to point out character flaws.
6. Indeed, in a character study, the character is more important than the reader because the emphasis is placed on knowing everything about the character (like the character's likes, friends, personality, physical appearance, etc)
The answer is A. My father and my grandfather played football in college.
Answer:
In paragraph 8 of the write-up "Quilt of a Country", the author - Anna Quindlen having analysed the sociological makeup of America, its unity regardless of the foundational dissimilarities refers to the act of complaining about other people who are different as pride.
He makes this assertion then goes on to justify why by relating the fact that the deaths toll of 9-11 does not comprise of one category of people.
It can also be inferred that he alludes to the fact that if terrible times such as wars and terrorism can equalise us and bind us together, how much more unified should we be in the time of peace?
Cheers
Answer:
Most immigrants had experienced so much extreme change and uprooting, they felt like they had witnessed enough change to last several lifetimes.
Answer:
false
It is very common to compare Socrates with Jesus Christ insofar as they both act as "founding fathers" of Western culture. For two thousand years, each generation has built its own image of Socrates and Jesus; and Christianity has tended to see in Socrates a kind of cultural ancestor, who embodies the figure of the unjustly persecuted good man.
Traditionally they have been considered two martyrs of thought and miles of people in all times have been inspired by their moral example. Comparing is, however, a complex exercise because the Jewish world of the first century before our era had nothing to do with the world of the fifth century in which Socrates lived: the Greek cultural context was polytheistic and the Hebrew was monotheistic.
In Athens, and in classical Greek culture, there is no concept of "sin", which does exist in the Jewish world. Evil and guilt were not linked in Greece in the way they were in the Jewish tradition. Israel were also militarily occupied by the Romans, and although Athens did not live in its time of greatest expansion, in the time of Socrates It was a city that was hardly free and rich - or at least we could easily remember its time of splendor. Nor did the religious instances lose in Athens the power that the Temple of Jerusalem had at the time of Jesus.
In outline, and although we identify what to clarify, we can present a series of similarities and differences between Socrates and Jesus
