All categories

3 years ago

Which best describes one way in which "Civil Disobedience" impacted people and events later in history?

2 answers:

8 0

The correct answer for this question is this one: "It fortified the beliefs of those who thought the government acted unfairly." The statement that best describes one way in which "Civil Disobedience" that impacted people and events later in history is that it helps fortify the beliefs of those people that they thought the government is unfair.

Alik [6]3 years ago

8 0

"Civil Disobedience," written by Thoreau argues that the government act unfairly. So, people must do something according to what is said by their conscience rather than obey the law which in its implementation is often unfair.

EXPLANATION

Henry David Thoreau is known for his essay entitled "Civil Disobedience". Thoreau states that a person is obliged to break the law if his conscience says that the law is unfair. "Breaking the law means that you provide a better life for yourself" (Thoreau, P. 18)

He is different from other Americans who fully believe in the law. However, Thoreau did not necessarily encourage people to become criminals. Thoreau said that a criminal is a person who violates the law and will not be responsible for his crime. He just advises someone not to obey the unfair laws, so that everyone can realize that, he is not obeying the law because the law is not fair.

So, someone must be prepared to accept the consequences that occur because of actions that do not comply with the law. Thoreau assured that people must be willing to go to jail if they want to make changes to the unfair laws. Thoreau went to prison not merely for not paying his taxes, but because he believed that the government was using the money for things that were not right.

This is a way that according to Henry Thoreau can change laws that are considered unfair. So the case will be lifted, people will be aware, and a revolution/reform will occur.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• Considering "Civil Disobedience," why did both Thoreau and Martin Luther King, Jr. engage in acts of civil disobedience?

brainly.com/question/9005582

KEYWORD: Henry David Thoreau, unfair, law. Civil Disobedience

Subject: History

Class: 10 - 12

Subchapter: Civil Disobedience

You might be interested in

What is a question/task in an essay?

nataly862011 [7]

It is called the Thesis

4 0

4 years ago

Question 19 of 20:

Naily [24]

Where are the statements, can you upload a picture of the statement so that I can answer your question

4 0

3 years ago

What does your hug is a warm blanket on a cold dy mean

timofeeve [1]

A hug makes you feel warm inside and when you feel sad it's like the outside is cold and the hug is the blanket. :)

7 0

3 years ago

Opposite of dreamy eyed

Hoochie [10]

Dreamy-eyed is a term usually used to describe people who adore other people. You get dreamy-eyed if you dream to be with someone or you just simply like to be with another person. An opposite of dreamy-eyed could be unromantic, where the person doesn't feel attraction towards anyone.

ANSWER: Unromantic

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The monster , in terror , had fled the premises for ever! I should be behold it no more ! My happiness was supreme ! The guilt o

Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

Taken from the ending part of the short story "The Black cat" by Edgar Allen Poe, the lines tell of the alcoholic protagonist's happiness in finding that the cat responsible for the incidental murder of his wife is nowhere to be seen in his house anymore.

Explanation:

Edgar Allen Poe's short story "The Black Cat" tells the story of an unnamed protagonist who is an alcoholic. His drunken act of killing his pet cat Pluto and then later on even his accidental murder of his wife leads to the situation he is in the start of he story- convicted to death.

The given excerpt is form the ending part of the story where he had successfully walled in his wife's corpse. He could't find the cat, he second pet cat, who had been the initial cause of the act. The lines show just how relieved he was to see that he could no longer find "<em>the monster</em>" in is house. But with this admission, he seems to be implying that he was free of the moral obligations in he society in general. This speech gave him he all clear in the murderous act, but which will in fact, return to haunt him and bring him to justice.

3 0

3 years ago