The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.
Answer:
Publication of Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle
Explanation:
<span>A tyrant, of course -- the rest are just regular or extravagant people. :)</span>
The answer is B. No.
The workers were not highly skilled but were prepared to work for lower wages and salaries. That's why people disliked them, because they felt that their jobs were being taken away by people who are willing to work for low wages and live in poverty just to earn something.
Answer:
Roger Sherman created the great compromise.
