This depends on ideals and opinions but from my point of view it is not a fair and democratic way of selecting the president due to the fact that the citizens of this country have no real say in who is president. Therefore it is not democratic. Fair? No because the electoral college Can have biases just like any other human and they are not the majority. This goes hand in hand with the democracy question. If I was to be democratic. The citizens should cancel out what the electoral college says.
Now I’m the side of the reasoning as to why the electoral college exists. It’s understandable. Everyone is not trustable enough to decide the fate of the country. Overall it is not fair and democratic.
A) Aurangzeb is ya answer
The correct answer is <span>that they had to grant leeway for the adoption of some domestic reforms inside east european countries
Although there were numerous protests, riots, coups, and similar things, they were mostly stopped by the Soviet Union using the power of the military. This victory was difficult however and they understood that without giving satellite states some leeway that they would face numerous other problems in state governing.</span>
The correct answer is that Russia and Britain sent troops to protect their interests there. This was aimed at ensuring that the countries had substantial influence in order to restrict foreign access. Oil was an important resource and still remains important as an energy source
