Answer:
Explanation:
The ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland, pronounced in 1819 by the Supreme Court, laid the definitive foundations of federalism as the form of organization of the nation.
The case began because the state of Maryland had tried to stop the operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States in its territory. Basically, the state tried to approve a higher tax burden on all bills that had not been issued by state banks, thus making this bank's operations more expensive and favoring Maryland banks. Its objective was to limit the power of the federal government to regulate monetary policy in its territory, making the rights of the state prevail over those of the federal government.
The Supreme Court, led by federalist John Marshall, ruled against said tax, arguing that it limited the implicit powers of Congress, based on the "necessary and proper" clause of Article I of the Constitution, which allows Congress to carry on certain necessary and proper functions. Therefore, it determined that said tax was unconstitutional and allowed the Second Bank of the United States to continue operating normally.
Answer:
d
) Patriots were more likely than Loyalists to believe in the idea of consent of the governed.
Explanation:
The first thing you would understand is that Loyalists were called Loyalists because they supported the rules of Great Britain. If they supported staying as a colony, why would they have any will in the first place to "go to war" with Great Britain if they are contend with the status they hold during the time? The only group that wanted to go to war was the Patriot group, not the Loyalist group.
Answer:
He defined Black Consciousness as "an inward-looking process" that would "infuse people with pride and dignity". To promote this, the BCM adopted the slogan "Black is Beautiful". One of the ways that Biko and the BCM sought to achieve psychological empowerment was through community development.
Answer:
So Woman were forbidden from entering into legal contracts, nor could They be A party To Lawsuits Or Uhhhhhhhh Testify In court. Wives Couldn't Engage In commerce Without a Husband written a Permission, and all property In a marriage Was the husband's and simply The code Was The numbers was sexist Which I think if reflected Napoleon's Own sexism.
The Code stated, “A husband owes protection to his wife, a wife obedience to her husband, yet the wife’s protection depended on circumstances.
Answer:
that are reversed in American history in a solution with the American revolution the collision of human independence the United States is constitution with the friends of 6 Feb 1778 the premier league articles of peace with the great Britain in London 13 November 1782
the French
GK questions of rights of man and citizen 26 August 1798
relation of rights of man and citizens from the constitution of year
1793
condition of rights and duties of man and citizen constitution of the year 3795