1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Volgvan
3 years ago
10

Differentiate between environmental science and environmentalism. Define each term and explain how they are similar and how they

differ.
Geography
1 answer:
ziro4ka [17]3 years ago
8 0

Explanation:  They both study and address environmental issues. The ultimate goal of both, and the similarity between them, is to improve the environment as a place of life for each of us. In both cases, meaning similarity, the role of man in improving the living environment is emphasised. The scientific approach reveals and gathers significant scientific facts and knowledge that can again be used by various environmental activists in protection of the environment in terms of both prevention and restoration of polluted natural resources.

The difference between them is that environmental science uses scientific methods to study the environment, and it can be said that they use an objective scientific approach to this problem. Environmentalists, on the other hand, use a wider range of ways to deal with this problem, often with an emotional and biased approach. Environmentalists take a wide variety of actions, which of course are not just scientific, in the pursuit of environmental improvements, living conditions. So environmental science is looking for knowledge on this subject, such as human interaction with nature and vice versa pointing it only to scientific facts within the institutions intended for such a thing. Again, on the other hand, environmentalists often have political appearances on this issue, and then they often perform dramatically in order to point out in important political places human impact on the environment, which can be detrimental to it and ultimately pernicious to the people themselves. So environmentalism can be said to be a kind of social concern for the environment and people, while environmental science about the environment with only scientific facts, and with that knowledge collected, emphasises the importance of environmental sustainability.

You might be interested in
Which of the following countries are island nations in Southeast Asia?
8_murik_8 [283]
T<span>he Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia are islands nations in Southeast Asia.

In short, Your Answer would be Option B

Hope this helps!</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP PLS THIS IS DUE TODAY I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST I will put the link of book in the comments
Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

Shale and sandstone are clastic rocks and they both have a smooth texture. Shale is made of tiny particles of clay. Sandstone is made of sand and quartz. while Shale forms from compaction.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a reverse fault, where does the hanging wall move relative to the footwall?
goldfiish [28.3K]

The answer is;

The hanging wall rises above the footwall. This type of fault occurs due to compression tectonic movement that squishes the two crusts. This way the faulted section of rock shortens. This is the opposite of normal faults where the hanging wall falls below the footwall. This is due to extension tectonic movements that lengthen the faulted section.


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which u.s. state is the smallest in terms of land area?
solong [7]
Rhode Island is the smallest state in the United States.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a 3 to 4 paragraph essay of how you would convince a logger from illegally cutting down trees? Provide logical reasons to
Phoenix [80]

Answer:

In the past years, nature has been rapidly deteriorating due to human actions. One of the most prominent issues is deforestation. We as humans depend on trees to provide lumber, paper, and much more but at the same time trees also provide us with oxygen, prevent soil erosion, and provide a habitat for many species of animals.

The Amazon Rainforest is the home to billions of organisms and thousands of species. As we continue to destroy the habitat of these species, we are causing many of them to become endangered and even extinct. Though the death of a few birds or trees may not seem significant, everything in our planet is connected in some way. The extinction of one species can cause a major gap in the food web, impacting the entire ecosystem. For example, deforesting the habitat of birds will cause them to more easily be captured by their predators. The predator population will then grow exponentially, but because the bird population is decreasing the predator population will eventually die out. Since now there are no predators at all in the area for pests such as mice, these pests can no infest agricultural farms killing crops. Without these crops we humans cannot survive, so in the end us humans will be the ones impacted by our own actions. This example may seem like an exaggerated example to many, but when you take a look back at the major famines throughout history you will be able to see the trend.

It is understandable that many people depend on logging to make a living for themselves and their families. but other selfish people just want the best for themselves. In order to combat these two problems we must persuade governments to put harsher laws in place for those who illegally damage environment for their own benefits, and provide support to those whose jobs may be at risk due to environmental protection regulations. If the greedy are punished for their actions, it will keep them from deforesting more trees. As for the loggers, if the government can provide basic or vocational education to those people so they have the ability to work in other fields (can be related to logging like environmental protection or something different that won't harm the environment), then it will allow the people affected to smoothly transition to another style of living that won't harm the environment.

Explanation:

You first need to provide some scientific and specific evidence for what logging is doing to the environment for some credibility. Afterwards you need to explain <em>why</em> people should care about those impacts. Then in the end make sure to state the stakeholders and provide a few examples of how they can benefit from slowing down deforestation.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did it take so much time and effort to build the panama canal?
    7·2 answers
  • Name two ways in which the earth system relies on energy from the sun
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is TRUE?
    15·1 answer
  • What happen in the democratic Republic of Congo shortly after the Belgian Congo received independence from Europe rule
    15·2 answers
  • Why do some plants grow faster then others.
    5·1 answer
  • Explain how a sudden large net out-migration can impact an aging country.
    7·1 answer
  • Could focusing on clean energy and pollution reduction have a a negative impact on the economy of California?
    15·1 answer
  • How dose the climate of Latin America effect people.
    14·1 answer
  • In the map, below A represents _______
    6·1 answer
  • Advances in air travel have contributed to globalization by:
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!