Answer: The industrial revolution was a major time of change. I hope this was helpful!
The "Manifest Destiny" is a representation of an idea that justifies United States massive expansion throughout the 19th Century. It states that it was part of the plans of God that the United States, as a superior, dominated all of America, and the Americans of the United States were blessed. There was a national feeling of accomplishment and a political tendency of Economic Nationalism.
The expansion started with the Westward settlement of Americans and by the support of the 1787 Northwest Ordinance, there was the possibility of annexation of new states. Since then, the United States had a significant growth of its original territory, mainly through the following ways:
- Wars for territories (e.g Mexican-American War)
- Broken treaties with Indians (that limited the territory of Indian occupation)
- Purchase of territories (e.g Louisiana Purchase)
The annexation of the new states implied that they were settled in a condition of "Free" or "Slave" state, according to the region they and the politics of the place. This, along with the different political views and need of homogeneity of federal decisions (a feeling that the North was benefited by federal laws and decisions.) created a sectarian feeling on the country that led later to the separation of the United States of America (Northern, predominately free states) to the Confederate States of America (predominately slave states), and ultimately led to the Civil war in the 1860's
We can say Manifest Destiny united the people of United States in a general feeling of prosperity, in a kind of religious way, but divided the states itself , because of the need of the new states "identity" to be determined.
Answer:
The answer is B. selfish and corrupt
Explanation:
Because it is.
Answer:
The power of the Executive Branch is vested in the President of the United States, who also acts as head of state and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. The President is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress and, to that end, appoints the heads of the federal agencies, including the Cabinet. The Vice President is also part of the Executive Branch, ready to assume the Presidency should the need arise.
Hope this helps!
"<em>History is Written by the Victors</em>", Winston Churchill.
"<em>What is History, but a fable agreed upon? </em>", Napoleon Bonaparte.
The quotes above demonstrate exactly why there were few to no Allied actions that were heavily judged upon and incited as a war crime during the era. Both's sides rational thinking are based upon one objective, in that they must do everything that is necessary to ensure their own victory (up to a certain case).
For example, the Bataan Death March was essentially born of the culture of the Japanese people. On top of that, there was no system in which to enforce the rules of war, especially in a all out war like World War II. However, due to the eventual defeat of the Japanese and the Axis Power, the Bataan Death March was placed as a war crime that was answerable by the Japanese government. On the other hand, the US's Biscari massacre of German and Italian troops is seen more of a necessity, rather than a war crime in the day and age.
The point proven above is that war crimes are extremely subjective, especially during and just after the time it takes place, and is judged primarily by the victors of that war. If they were the one's that committed it, it was a necessity, if it was their enemies, it was a war crime. The decision is non-agreeable, in that crimes should be treated fairly, regardless of which side initiated it, but it is without doubt realistic, in that the crimes committed on the winning side is hid as to portray one's own as the saviors of the world.
~
