Answer:
Como parte del Compromiso de 1850, California fue admitida como estado libre (1850), sin ser un estado esclavista. Para evitar la creación de una mayoría de estados libres en el Senado, California acordó enviar un delegado a favor de la esclavitud y un senador antiesclavista al Congreso.
Explanation:
Answer: A. Increased worker participation in industrial life is beneficial.
Explanation: Utilitarianism is a moral theory in philosophy that advocates actions that supports general happiness or pleasure and moves away from or rejects actions that cause unhappiness or harm. For utilitarians, happiness is the overarching value; it is the only thing that is good in and of itself. Values are placed according to how happy it can make the people.
In the early 19th century, utilitarians tended to favor free trade the laissez fair view of ADAM SMITH. Today they favor the idea of increased worker participation and a more equitable(fair and impartial) distribution of income and resources. This would seem to bring happiness which is the ultimate goal for Utilitarians.
The Grinch tried to steal Christmas in the 1996 cartoon
Question:
Why do you think Lincoln didn't end slavery in the north?
Answer:
The proclamation didn't end slavery because it didn't affect the border slave states that weren't in rebellion, and it had no immediate effect in most of the deep South because, at least on the day it was issued, the slaves were in territory still controlled by the Confederacy.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.
In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.
-Alan Becker
#2 is poor and that's it im going to tell u
