According to Thomas Paine, it is just and justifiable to go to war under two circumstances. One of them is when the sacrifice of a few men would save masses of human beings and made them happy. The evidence of this can be grasped by the phrase he uses: '... when a little might have saved the whole, and made them happy.'
The other situation that can justify a war is when troops invade a country and make it theirs. Paine beholds a country as a home, that's why he uses that metaphor to describe a piece of land. The evidence for this statement is when he says '... but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it... am I to suffer it?
On the other hand, he does not believe it is justifiable to go to war seeking wealth. He states: 'Not all the treasures of the world, so far as I believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war...'
Magazines produced in the age, history book, books from the library based on the year, google.
The correct option is letter B as it demonstrates the difficulties experienced by the group throughout the poem and the fact that they have been able to move forward.
Option A is not possible because the focus of the poem is not singing with others, but to leave hardships behind.
Option C is incorrect because it is not specified in the poem that the group has goals to achieve in a timely manner.
Option D has some relevance, but again, the poem does not talk about having plans in a structured way, it is more about an intention of going forward in life without a defined set of goals.
Answer:
I think i could be C (DISCLAIMER im not 100%!!)
Explanation:
