Answer:
Both statements are False
Explanation:
<u>Statement a</u>
As with higher debt involved the expected return on investment is more on equity. But reducing debt up till a certain level is beneficial in that condition, but there is an ideal debt to equity ratio of 1 - 1.5, it varies upon the industry requirements and conditions.
Although the theory which states that reducing debt will reduce cost of equity and of debt is false as there is a tax benefit on debt which states that cost is always less of debt.
<u>Statement b</u>
Financial distress and bankruptcy has several reasons to occur, and one of them is borrowing.
It do not depend on the level of borrowings, whether moderate or high, borrowings demand compulsory payment in the terms of interest due, which leads to a burden on the company. This also increases the demand of shareholders.
Thus, the statement is false.
Answer:
The answer is: B) the supply of workers, and the demand curve is the demand for their labor.
Explanation:
In the labor market;
The supply curve represents the amount of labor that the workers are willing to offer at different price levels (wages).
The demand curve represents the number of workers that businesses are willing and able to hire at different wages.
This requirement is an example of an order qualifier
<u>Explanation:</u>
Order qualifiers are the competing interests that a firm must prove to be a feasible opponent in the market field. An order qualifier is a quality of goods or assistance that is wanted for the goods/assistance to indeed be viewed by a client.
Order qualifiers are the ambitious criteria that create a firm's outcomes observed as access for marketing by purchasers. For a firm to remit order qualifiers, they have to be at least as great as their opponent. When a firm's thought of order winners and qualifiers rivals the customer's opinion of the equivalent, there endures a "fit" among the pair of panoramas.
Here only contractors that were licensed and bonded would be considered shows that the client is interest to a quality of assistance is wanted to paint.
Answer:
increase by $11,000
Explanation:
The computation of net operating income is shown below:-
Revenue = Sales per unit × Sales price per unit
= 3,000 × $70
= $210,000
Less variable costs = Sales per unit × Variable cost per unit
= 3,000 × $50
= $150,000
Fixed costs = $25,000
Net income = Revenue - Less variable costs - Fixed costs
= $210,000 - $150,000 - $25,000
= $35,000
Contribution margin per units = $70 - $50
= $20
Increase by 10%, it will be
$20 × (1 + 0.1)
= $22
If it decrease by 20%
= $25,000 × (1 - 0.20)
= $20,000
Net income = $3,000 × 22 - 20,000
= 46,000
So it was 35,000, with the changes it is 46,000. That increase by $11,000
The difference in height between the hill 973 feet above sea level and the crack 79 feet below sea level is:
Difference in height = 973 - (-79)
Which is equal to 1052 feet.
