The objectives of new imperialism included accessing exchange courses and crude materials, spreading religious esteem, helping the vulnerable Africans as a piece of "The White Man's Burden", and increasing political predominance over different nations. The Europeans segmented off Africa to the diverse forces, from their the Europeans attacked the nations, colonized, subjugated the locals and constrained them to cultivate the crude products.
Early modern philosophy in Europe and Great Britain is awash with discussions of the emotions: they figure not only in philosophical psychology and related fields, but also in theories of epistemic method, metaphysics, ethics, political theory and practical reasoning in general. Moreover, interest in the emotions links philosophy with work in other, sometimes unexpected areas, such as medicine, art, literature, and practical guides on everything from child-rearing to the treatment of subordinates. Because of the breadth of the topic, this article can offer only an overview, but perhaps it will be enough to give some idea how philosophically rich and challenging the conception of the emotions was in this period. Most attention will be devoted to the familiar figures of early modern philosophy and how they conceived of the emotions as valuable, even indispensable aspects of embodied human life, which were largely constitutive of the self and identity that matter to us practically.
A word of caution is in order: there is a plethora of source material, and this entry is offered as a survey for organizing that material. Alas, much worthy material must be excluded here. This article and its supplements are designed for readers browsing for specific information, as well as those hardy souls who may wish to read it straight through. The main document offers a thematic overview of early modern discussions of the emotions. Separate links lead to documents devoted to the pre-history of the topic, as well as to some of the most important individual figures in early modern philosophy. Hope this helps! Mark brainly please this took me a lot of time!
Answer:
The Long March greatly strengthened Mao Zedong's leadership position.
Explanation:
The Long March was the military retreat that the Communist Red Armies undertook during the civil war of 1934, leaving their encircled post in Southeast China. This move also led to the change in their operational base to Northwestern China. This historical trek took them a year, covering more than 4,000 miles, crossing mountain ranges and rivers along the way. While this heroic act led many young Chinese to be inspired to join the cause, it also cemented the leadership position of Mao Zedong.
I did because Britian refused to stop seizing Americans ships that traded with France- Britain's enemy in Europe
Answer:
selling indulgences
Explanation:
Luther was most opposed to the idea of people absolving sins through indulgences. Indulgences are payments people make to the church that forgives all sins and "guarantees" their path to heaven. Luther wrote about how this was wrong in the 95 theses as it went against what God said.
