... analysis of Chapter 13<span> in Lois Lowry's </span>Number the Stars<span> that won't make </span>you<span> snore. ... She's incredibly upset, but she </span>can<span>'t </span>do<span> anything about it because she's in ... Annemarie is supposed to act completely innocent (and even a little dumb)</span>
There is two reasons. This is what I think but I don't know if it's true. It's probably because the fence is too old and weak or the geese probably helped him climb out. I really need to re-read Charllote's Web again to figure out that part. But I think reason 1 makes more sense though. Hope I helped.
Answer:
The subject is the puppy and the predicate is chewed
Explanation:
Subject is what the Sentence is about and Predicate is a verb stating something about the subject.
The correct answer is none of these
The first story has a bar as the main setting, while the second and the third don't even mention the existence of a gambling parlor.
Answer:
1. Teacher.
The article mentions that Lewis Hine was a former teacher which meant that he had worked closely with kids and could therefore understand the effects of a child being made to do strainers work.
2. He used photos to bring attention to issues much like Social media does today. His photographs were also artistic like the filters used on social media.
3. ⇒ There would be extra income in the house
⇒It would make the children stronger and better equipped to face the world.
4. They did not learn to read or write.
5. Specialized skilled labor get paid the highest in society and one can usually only get to this level if they are educated which means that quitting school usually relegates a family to a lower financial status from now to the future.