It would be B. The Presidential Debate
1. Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases in which the accusation pertains to a violation of federal law, and also in cases where parties involved in a lawsuit are from different states within the US or if one of the parties is a foreign entity.
- An example of the first type would be if police officers or a police department were accused of violating the civil rights of an individual or group. This would be tried in a federal court.
- An example of the second type would be if a business owner in one state was sued by someone from another state for breach of contract or for fraudulent business practice.
2. Presidents (in general) will tend to appoint judges who align with their own views on political justice because they don't want their own attempts at leadership blocked by the courts, and also they hope to be able to leave a lasting legacy on nation overall through what they would consider favorable court decisions. Ideally, however, presidents will choose appointees for federal courts and the Supreme Court based on the overall strength of their qualifications, not merely based on political leanings they may seem to have.
3. Once a case reaches the Supreme Court, the The Supreme Court itself decides which cases it will hear.
The Supreme Court is asked to review more than 7,000 cases each year, so it would not be possible for the court to hear and make a decision on every case that is sent to it. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100 to 150 cases per year. The vast majority of those cases work their way up to the Supreme Court from lower courts. About two-thirds of the cases come from lower federal court decisions that are appealed for review, and about one-third of the cases are reviewing decisions made by supreme courts of individual states.
There are some cases that can have original jurisdiction at the Supreme Court level -- such as when there is a case between one state government and another or between state governments and the federal government. These are more rare within the overall agenda of the Court.
Um hello spanish are native americans i hope you like this answer
-XxJessica32Xx
Answer:
Explanation:
It was probably the most complex operation carried out in WWII. Operation Overlord (as it was called) had many features, some of which are listed below.
- It involved many nations (Britain, The United States, Canada to name 3 of the major participants on the allied side.
- It involved coordinating many types of armed forces. The infantry, the navy, the air force, paratroopers, spies and even civilians of one kind or another were involved.
- It had a "hoax" component. That is what it was actually called. The Germans had to be persuaded that one beach was equally likely as another to be attacked. Also the deployment of men had to be very carefully disguised. There is one story that came out after the war, that tents had to be set up (with no one using them) to persuade the Germans that men would be deployed from this position (when in fact that was never the intent).
- The date of the attack was a closely guarded military secret. Any time you go to that much care to guard a time and date, you know that the operation was quite complex.
- Quite a few generals were involved. That alone would lead to its complexity.
These are just a few comments. D Day is an extremely interesting study, well worth your time.
The first battle of cabin creek resulted in a union victory
