Answer: This argument has Some merits but it also has some logical errors that undermines its reasoning and conclusion.
Explanation:
(1) IT FAILED TO GIVE THE TOTAL POPULATION OF WORKERS FROM WHERE THE SAMPLE(1200 PEOPLE) WERE DERIVED AND WHAT SAMPLING METHOD WAS USED: This is a logical error, sampling has to be in RELATION TO THE POPULATION.The sampling method should have been defined.Samples may have been taken from a given A CLASS OF WORKERS.
(2) IT SHOULD HAVE GIVEN CLEARER AND OTHER CHOICES RELATED TO MANAGEMENT ISSUES: It should have made more choices of questions about management issues so that a BROAD, ELABORATE, REASONABLE,ACCURATE AND CONVINCING conclusion will be arrived at.
Answer:
1. A. It is your responsibility as a citizen of Mother Earth to treat her with respect.
2. C. According to experts, the plan will cost twice as much as the mayor said.
3. B. I told my seven-year-old daughter about the plan, and she started to cry.
Explanation:
The above options are correct.
In No. 1, Option A is the ethical appeal because it appeals to the sense of right or wrong. It shows the speaker's position on the need to respect Mother Earth since one is her citizen. It is seen ethical to respect Mother Earth.
In No. 2, Option C uses logical appeal. It gives fact about what experts had said about the plan.
In No. 3, Option B uses emotional appeal. It appeals to the emotional. When the daughter was told of the plan, she started crying. Her tears will appeal to the emotions of whoever hears about it.
Answer:
fhjxse UK JC drdu7dfyjjxsddghddddsdyi
Gravitational firce and speed,light i guess. LOL im not even sure is this is right
