Answer:
I would agree.
Explanation:
Because all the wealthy american have the choice to help the poor but they choose not to because they feel that they are of a higher standard than them. This shows that they do not value equality, they do not give to those in need.
My opinion tho!
Answer: These rights, according to Locke, are not granted to humans; people are born with them. People learn and grow in different ways, according to him, since they are exposed to diverse things. The one thing that all individuals have in common is that they are human and have a human essence that is universal.
Answer: In March 1945 the Japanese imprisoned the French administrators and took direct control of Vietnam until the Allies defeated them in August. At that point, the Vietnamese August Revolution set up a Provisional Government, but the French took back control of the country in 1945–1946
Is the interstate commerce act a valid example of pure socialism?
No it is not. The reason it's not is this is that Socialism has to do with ownership of the means of production and distribution, which means how the surplus value generated by the means of production is used.
the Interstate Commerce act has nothing to do with socialism.
It is an example of government interventionism in a market-based economy. It did not attempt to change the method of ownership and allocation of surplus value in the railroad industry, nor did it attempt to introduce worker self-management.
Potsdam
Yalta
Tehran
=i think it should be Tehran I just finished this question one day ago and k got it correct
