1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ANTONII [103]
3 years ago
8

One day word came that a savage wolf had been seen in the forest." How I should like to meet that wolf," said little Gilbert. He

was only seven years old, but now all his thoughts were about the savage beast."Shall we take a walk this morning?" asked his mother." Oh, yes!" said Gilbert. "Perhaps we may see that wolf among the trees. But don't be afraid." His mother smiled, for she felt quite sure that there was no danger.    
What point of view does the author use in this selection?

A) First Person

B) Second Person

C) Third Person Limited

D) Third Person Omniscient
English
2 answers:
djyliett [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: its d

Explanation:

soldier1979 [14.2K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: D) Third person omniscient

Explanation: This passage demonstrates the third person omniscient point of view. The narrator is not a character in the story. Readers find out what the characters do, feel, and think.

You might be interested in
What is your list of top ten favorite books of all time. Please list at least 10 or possibly just a few and give a short summary
OverLord2011 [107]
I have one called "This is Where It Ends" not sure who its by but its about a school shooting from different perspectives. Hope this helped☺
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How might losing heat too quickly be a disadvantage to an organism
dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

it will result in loss of energy

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can some one help me with this English assignment i'll give 25 points.<br> thanks
tester [92]

A.

It is a first-person voice, which can be seen on the use of first-person pronouns from the beginning through the end.

B.

The speaker presents as civillian and the poem adresses a soldier. This can be seen both in the poem and in the title of it.

C.

Not only tries to conserve the same rhythm and meter by linking the end of a verse with the following, it also emphasizes a phrase or word and shows the relation of the phrase or word to what has gone before (almost like sentence diagramming). This adds richness to the poem and its images, like in the first indentation between ‘quarrel’ and ‘stood still’.

D.

That image of shooting but shooting ‘goods’, food and comfort, produces an effect of surprise, of slight shock due to the inversion: in this case, the civillian does the shooting, not the soldier. The image is unexpected, but it also further describes this civillian by describing the items that are going to be shot: items that are tied to life, they can prolonge life (it’s food) and not end it, like bullets.

E.

The question poised at the end can be read as being ‘shot’ by the civillian to both the soldier and also the reader. The question proposes a reflection about war, about what is the purpose or intent of it, what is the ulterior meaning behind it. Can a soldier find meaning on it? Can a civillian do it? The decision of ending with a question ties to this idea of keeping the poem open and alive in the memory of its readers, instead of a firm or concrete affimartion.

F.

The poet finds war to be something incomprehensible, something that doesn’t make sense or have a real meaning behind it. It’s senseless, it is “impartial death”, “confusion” and incomprehensible to both the civillians and the soldiers. While the poet has this attitude about war, it shows empathy and consideration for the soldier, for its “plight”, as one can see at the end. The poet has hope and wants the soldier (and the reader by extent) to reflect on war, to form a sort of empathy link with the civillian(s).

7 0
3 years ago
Can somebody help me what to write next/ continue? Like I don't know what to write and worse I'm not even native English speaker
vampirchik [111]

Explanation:

Pixar’s filmmakers aren’t resistant to the thought that each one children’s films need morals. They’re just creative about what they teach their audience. Too many kid-accessible animated films spout generic, well-worn tropes: follow your dreams, believe yourself, you'll do anything if you are trying . But Pixar’s Inside Out stands up for sadness as a helpful emotion. Up teaches grade-schoolers that they’ll never be too old for adventures, even once their partners and their youthful dreams die. And in 2003, Finding Nemo became a $900 million box-office smash by scolding overprotective parents, encouraging kids to not let their folks’ nervous fussing hold them back, and gently suggesting that disabilities aren’t an equivalent as limitations.

The sequel, Finding Dory, doubles down thereon last idea with a whole story focused on dealing with disability and despair, couched within the usual Pixar antic adventure. Finding Nemo’s title character has one undersized fin and isn’t a robust swimmer, but adversity and a similarly fin-impaired model build his confidence. Similarly, Finding Dory features a character with a debilitating handicap who develops coping mechanisms, gets help where she will , forges ahead when help isn’t available, and succeeds on her own terms. In a way, this is often another “Believe in yourself and you'll do anything” story. But by refining and focusing that message, writer-director Andrew Stanton and co-director Angus MacLane make it far more relevant. Many kids won’t notice the message: Finding Dory doesn’t explain it in patronizing detail. But it’s likely to strike home for the viewers who most need it, and identify most closely with the story.

Finding Nemo follows Marlin (Albert Brooks), a traumatized and nervous clownfish, on a transoceanic voyage to save lots of his one surviving child, Nemo (Alexander Gould). On the journey, Marlin gets enthusiastic help from Dory (Ellen DeGeneres), a Pacific regal blue tang with severe memory issues. Like Guy Pierce's Leonard in Memento, Dory only has short bursts of functionality before she forgets what she's doing, and whatever she just learned. Finding Nemo plays her condition for laughs, as she keeps forgetting who Marlin is, and what his son is named . (Fabio? Bingo? Harpo?) But she's desperate and vulnerable, too. Finding Dory digs deeper into her vulnerabilities, as a random set of associations triggers her memories of her parents (voiced by Diane Keaton and Eugene Levy). She doesn't remember where they're , or how she lost them, but a bit like Marlin within the first film, she's frantic to reunite together with her missing kin. She quickly finishes up on her own and is usually lost and confused about her purpose. Her determination keeps her moving forward, even as she advised Marlin to stay swimming find Nemo, and bit by bit, the pieces of her past start coming together.

Finding Dory is Andrew Stanton's return to writing and directing after the overly ambitious box-office disappointment John Carter. With this film, he's back on the comparatively safe ground of Pixar principles: an active celebrity cast, a fast-moving adventure filled with chases and jokey repartee, and a basic humanism that persists even when none of the many characters are human. Given the looseness of the plot — a one-thing-leads-to-another quest that periodically backtracks or goes in a circle — the load of the story is more on the characters than the plot developments. Stanton himself returns during a cameo because the whoa-dude surfer turtle Crush, Idris Elba and Dominic West voice a pair of helpful comedy-relief seals, and Kaitlin Olson (It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia) and Ty Burrell (Modern Family) play a nearsighted Rhincodon typus and an insecure beluga whale, respectively. But the film's breakout star is Hank (Ed O'Neill), a cranky seven-limbed octopus (technically, Dory says, he's a septopus) who helps Dory for selfish reasons. Like all Pixar's best grouchy old curmudgeons, he's filled with one-liners and hidden empathy. He's also, naturally, an escape artist and master of camouflage, because real-life octopi are awesome.

pls note if i were you i would cross the thing you wrote or if you want to keep it change is to this so it would be why this movie as that makes more sense. (i hope that makes sense)

8 0
3 years ago
Submit the following two items: evidence of your research on a Dr. Seuss book, which includes: title, author (Seuss), publisher,
docker41 [41]

Explanation:    a bird  bird comes and takes a massivsh1t on your head theres an awsome action  fight you throw it out a window and they all lived happaly ever afrter exept the bird

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Based on the passage, which argument would Boccaccio make regarding the actions of the flagellants?
    11·2 answers
  • How was Eliezer’s faith affected by his experiences in the book the night?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did people distrust during the 18th and 19th centuries?
    13·1 answer
  • Excerpt from The Ultimate Fighting Championship
    8·1 answer
  • Stan works on an assembly line. What would be the most appropriate way to cope with minor frustrations like hang-ups on a convey
    11·1 answer
  • Write a narrative essay about overcoming a challenge or obstacle in life and what you learned as a result. [PLEASE HELP WILL GIV
    11·1 answer
  • HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS IN UR OWN WORDS!
    8·1 answer
  • I need help. <br><br> Could someone plz.
    8·1 answer
  • Who delivers your offer to the seller
    7·1 answer
  • Match the modern word to the archaic word with the same meaning. Use a dictionary if necessary.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!