Answer: c. presumed conclusions based on the recurrence of specific instances
Explanation:
In the traditional logic, the representatives of traditional inductivism, saw the task of inductive logic in the analysis of the processes with which the general theoretical knowledge is obtained starting from the particular, the specific experiences.
Hence, one of the central concepts of contemporary inductive logic is that something has happened so much in different experiences, which is usually interpreted as the probability of the hypothesis taking into account the particular knowledge obtained. With this, contemporary inductive logic uses the methods of probability calculation
Answer:
We will write letters. We will call people. We will knock on doors.
Explanation:
Repitition of "we will"
This question is mostly interpretative. However, the majority could agree that the most appropriate answer would be C, as the figurative language and imagery used by the author are used in a manner that they're descriptive enough to keep the suspense of the scene, but not long enough to distract the audience from the events of the plot.
The last sentence- furthermore, city......
Answer:
Using facts that are backed up by creditable sources, keep a level head; speak or type confidently, when trying to persuade someone don't be quick to correct them or talk over them. make sure you let them share their views and then if you can, rearrange your passage to best fit their ideas.
Explanation:
(trust me, as a student studying law for fun, we do this a lot.
Hopefully that was helpful to some extent.)