The nations France, China and India have developed some strategies to protect their national culture, such as the implementation of International Humanitarian Law.
<h3 /><h3>What is
International Humanitarian Law?</h3>
It is the set of rules and norms referring to the protection of individuals and the historical cultural values of a people, which are an instrument of identification and historical valorization of a place, constituted as an intangible right of the human being.
Therefore, protecting a country's national culture is an important part of preserving its history, free expression of cultural values and assets that generate pride and identification in a population.
Find out more about culture here:
brainly.com/question/25010777
#SPJ1
Answer:
those above him/her couldn't serve
Explanation:
Attorney General is seventh in the line, so it is unlikely that something like this can happen. Still, in the case it happens it will happen only when those above him are not able to perform their duty. Of course this never happened in history.
Answer:
- It helped with the selection of able government officials.
- It caused an increase in artistic publications.
Explanation:
Neo-Confucianism is a Chinese philosophy that was influenced by Confucianism. The Neo-Confucianism was an attempt of removing mystical elements of Taoism and building a philosophy that could influence the people without mixing it with religion.
The Neo-Confucianism influenced social and ethical philosophy that defended knowledge as a way to rediscover the way of ancient scholars and to do social good.
It impacted ethics in the government and as a result, influenced the selection of government officials.
Neo-Confucianism also impacted art, because it defended that artistic production was socially useful and beneficial to people
Answer:
protection from self-incrimination
Explanation:
The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution was passed in 1791. It started among other things that "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury..."
This implies that an accused has the right not to reply to the police questions both while in custody or court. The purpose is for the protection from self-incrimination that may arise.