Which statement best explains the relationship between William's "Landscape with the Fall of Icarus" and of Brueghel's painting
of the same title? A. William's poem uses the painting to discuss a theme generally
B. William's poem is a likeness of the painting
C. William's poem compares the painting to other paintings
D. William's poem provides a new interpretation of the painting
The statement that best explains the relationship between William's "Landscape with the fall of Icarus" and Brueghel's painting of the same title is: B. William's poem is a likeness of the painting.
The poet William Carlos Williams is basically describing Brueghel's painting. Of course he does it from his perspective, focusing on the fact that it is spring and that Icarus's wings, made out of wax must have melted, making him fall to the sea, while nobody sees or pays attention to this event. The painting describes this same situation, the poetic voice is also indifferent to the fall of Icarus, and the painting wants the viewer to feel this indifference.
Judging by the sentences themselves, I would say the last sentence is the best concluding statement. However, I don't have the passage, so I can't 100% percent give you my opinion on the best concluding statement for your passage. (:
