1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ira Lisetskai [31]
3 years ago
14

There should be no minimum voting age.

History
2 answers:
Elodia [21]3 years ago
7 0
The answer would be D since many people wont agree but theres no proof to back it up.
Dafna11 [192]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is D. It is arguable but not defensible

Explanation:

A claim or thesis statement is a statement used in argumentative texts or persuasive speech to convince the audience about a certain idea, because of this a claim needs to be arguable which means not everyone agrees with it and defensible which means as although everyone does not agree with the claim there is evidence to explain it and prove it. In the case of the thesis statement "There should be no minimum voting age" this claim is arguably because is somehow controversial and not everyone agrees with it, but it is not defensible as the author of this statement might not find evidence to prove this as all evidence shows because of maturity, literacy, education, and other factors there has to be a minimum voting age. Therefore, the statement about this claim that is true is that it is arguable but not defensible.

You might be interested in
In which region of North America did the Great Awakening begin?
kaheart [24]
In midwest part the great awakening begin
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 6 (1 point)<br> Which of these was in the 13th Century?<br> 1218<br> 1315<br> 1409<br> 1300
nikklg [1K]

Answer:1218

Explanation: The century mark is always 100 years after the actual year.

3 0
1 year ago
Why was the Korean War both an international war and a civil war?
garri49 [273]

Answer:

North Korea, under the leadership of Kim Il-Sung, initiated the Korean War by invading the South - he was under the impression that communist guerrillas in South Korea had greatly weakened it. Also, prior to the invasion, there were already border clashes along the DMZ. Thus, the Korean War was very much a domestic conflict.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What military advantages did each side have during the civil war?
Vlada [557]
The North had certain advantages. (1) More than twice as many people lived in the North as in the South - 22 million in the North and 9 million in the South. Of the 9 million people in the South, two out of every five were blacks, most of whom were slaves. Slaves were not expected to fight. The slaves, however, might do the work at home and thus release white men to join the army. (2) Not only did the North have more people, but it had more resources and supplies. Most of the factories which could make guns, ammunition, uniforms, and the thousands of articles needed in war, were in the North. The North had more railroads to move goods and more men to do the fighting. It also had more shipping. (3) Furthermore, the United States government, its army, and its navy were already established and working. The South had to build these things as it went along. On the other hand, the South possessed certain advantages over the North. (1) For one thing, the South was fighting for the most part on its own soil. Men fight harder when they are defending their homes than when they are invading enemy territory. Also, they know the territory much better than the invaders possibly could. (2) In addition, the South had many outstanding military leaders who had resigned from the United States Army to fight for the Confederacy. Among these men was Robert E. Lee. Although Lee belonged to an old southern family, he did not believe in slavery and had already freed his slaves. Lee was also against secession and opposed to the war. But he could not bring himself to bear arms against his beloved state, Virginia. When that state seceded, therefore, Lee cast his lot with the Confederacy. Thus the South gained a brilliant general – the ablest and most thoroughly experienced in the whole United States Army. 
8 0
3 years ago
What did the new england puritans in north america emphasize?
liraira [26]
Education and Civic responsibility.
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • In "A Cub Pilot," why does the author say that the Mississippi is "fickle"?
    8·1 answer
  • who is decribed by.. Sultan of Egypt and Syria, successful capture of Jerusalem prompted the Third Crusade, respected by Richard
    7·1 answer
  • Why did friars and jesuits go to the Spanish colonies in the Americas
    5·1 answer
  • What do you thin is meant by the statement that Wiston churchhill possibly was britain most powerful weapon again Hitler's Germa
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE 40POINTS!!
    14·2 answers
  • The main economic activities in Singapore include __________.
    15·2 answers
  • What was the nubia known for​
    10·1 answer
  • The chart shows the gross domestic product of the United States from 1925 to 1939.
    6·2 answers
  • What happened during their
    12·1 answer
  • Why is the archaeological site of pompeii so important to our understanding of life in a roman town?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!