We are presented with a libertine speaker talking of many lovers. He suggests that, though he has spoken about the pain of love, it is only ‘Love’s pleasures’ that he cares about. As such, he has ‘betrayed’ ‘a thousand beauties’. He claims to have been a callous and deceiving lover, telling ‘the fair’ about the ‘wounds and smart’ they long to hear of, then ‘laughing’ and leaving. The poem is written in three elegant septets. Notice the iambic tetrameter and consider how important form might be to the theme of this particular kind of love and betrayal.
This speaker may not be entirely honest. The final stanza begins with ‘Alone’. Is there any sense of regret here? The speaker claims to be ‘Without the hell’ of love, yet in the same line we find reference to the ‘heaven of joy’. He may even also sacrificed his joy with his promiscuous love.
Answer:
A warrior <u>frightens</u> a gruesome monster <u>away.</u>
Explanation:
When you complete a sentence you have to make sure that the combination o verb and predicate are compatible, and that they express in the best possible way what you are trying to say. So let's analyze the answers:
1) frightens; away: this is grammatically correct, and both words combine well and add meaning to the message.
2) splits; in half: this is grammatically incorrect, it would have to be "into halves" or "in two"
3) kills; forever: kills already implies is forever, it is repetitive
4)beats; in pieces: beats doesn't imply that the monster was split into pieces, so these two words don't combine.
Answer:
i would say yes
Explanation:
yes because child neglect is the ongoing failure to meet a child's needs and this child has to go to a hospital.By the way is this child you????If it is Im so sorry those parents are awful
