Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother. He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
Stock of a corporation, is all of the shares into which ownership of the corporation is divided. In American English, the shares are collectively known as "stock". A single share of the stock represents fractional ownership of the corporation in proportion to the total number of shares.
I think its c instead, because he meant that fear was only making things worse. not fearing fear and failure would help in the long run; so a positive attitude instead would help.
One
Both the other two choices were determined by the economic structure of the south. Society was determined by money and so therefore were politics.
Two
The second one is pretty gray. They were interconnected. If I answered economic for the first blank, I pretty much have to do the same for the second. If the economy changed, so did the political and social functions. The social functions only look like they were the most challenging change that was taking place, but that was only because the economy could no longer support labor needs.
Three
Well you were uprooting their way of life. Anytime you do that to people, they are going to resist you. I'm not saying it's right. I'm merely saying that's what happens.
Sometime when you have the time watch Gone With the Wind. It is a classic movie having to do with this part of your question. Gerald, Scarlet's father, tries to show her that their wealth remained in tact by showing her the bonds he had bought to preserve their money. She looks at him in horror as she realizes those bonds are worthless. The society she knew has been been blown away. They are penniless and she knows it.
Four
This is an important question. Every American should know the answer.
XII is the emancipation Proclamation. You can't vote if you are not free.
XIV Gave male members the right to vote if they are citizens and 21 or more years old (See Section 2). The explanation of this Amendment is probably the longest of any amendment.
XV Color has nothing to do with who can vote.
My favorite is number 19 -- long overdue in every country.
XIX women were given the right to vote. It is probably the shortest amendment's explanations.
Answer:
World War 1 resulted in a somewhat extended period of time in which an economic boom occurred. After the war, the U.S. became a lender to other territories, including Latin America. Exports to Europe from the U.S. increased as countries prepared for war. The U.S. spending increased as it prepared to enter the war itself.
