1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
neonofarm [45]
3 years ago
7

Why did the Chinese rebuild the great the Great Wall in 1400

History
1 answer:
makkiz [27]3 years ago
4 0
Since then the Great Wall was built, rebuilt to protect the northern borders of the Chinese Empire from the Hun's and Mongolian attacks during the rule of successive dynasties.
You might be interested in
Contrast the 'Statue of Unity' in India and the <br> 'Burj Khalifa' in UAE.
3241004551 [841]

Answer:

Burj Khalifa is the tallest building in the world whereas Statue of Unity is the tallest statue in the world.

Explanation:

The Statue of Unity is a statue of Indian statesman and independence activist Vallabhbhai Patel, who was the first Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister of independent India while on the other hand, Burj Khalifa Dubai is an actually a multi-use building that has restaurants, a hotel, residential apartments, office space and is a tourist attraction site. The height of Statue of Unity is 183 meters whereas the height of Burj Khalifa is 828 meters. Burj Khalifa is the tallest building in the world whereas Statue of Unity is the tallest statue in the world.

4 0
3 years ago
How were the pleasures found in the ukiyo balanced against the strict culture of Tokugawa Japan?
love history [14]

Answer:

By restricting behavior to sectioned districts it allowed order while also permitting a place to sidestep oppression

Explanation:

I just took the quiz

8 0
3 years ago
I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
PolarNik [594]

Answer:

A. The government functioned as a single body of law in ancient Rome and E. ancient roman male citizens were required to serve in the military is the correct answer.

Explanation:

The people of Ancient Rome established the republic after overthrowing the last Etruscan king while the American people founded the republic after the American Revolution. Both Americans and Romans set up a government which is ruled by the people and for the people and both the systems are republic.

In republic, the head of the government is elected by the people and they elect their representatives for making laws. There are both similarities and dissimilarities between the ancient Roman republic and the government of US, both of them have executive and legislative branches in their government along with set of checks and balances. The head of the executive was the head of the military in both the governments, Executive also had the veto power and both governments had written laws.

The differences were that the Roman republic didn’t had a separate Judicial branch and the Rome was run by more than one consuls while the US has only one president. There was a provision for the dictator to take over the government in emergency situations but there is no such concept in US. The consuls also had religious duties while there it isn’t so in US. The slave labor was used In Roman republic while slavery has been outlawed in US. The Roman senators served for life while US senators serve only for six years. Roman women were not allowed to participate in government while they can do so in US. The roman social class was rigid in nature while the US social class  is flexible.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did john muir join forces with others to protect yosemite as a national park?
marshall27 [118]

Answer:

In the early 1870s, Muir pulled his Yosemite observations together and published articles about the grand scenery. He preached his theories and called those “juiceless masses” to join him in the mountains. Years later he wrote, “Try the mountain passes. ... Muir also began to call for protecting Yosemite and the Sierra.

Let me know if thats right, i feel like i read the question wrong

6 0
3 years ago
Explain a significant difference between the Iroquois and European groups that might lead to a conflict.
Ber [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Explain a significant difference between the Iroquois and European groups that might lead to a conflict.

Basically, one of the biggest differences between the Iroquois Native American Indians and the French was that the Indians wanted to be in the position of middlemen in the lucrative fur trade between the Europeans and French and the other tribes that lived in the west. This period of history in the North American territories was known as the French and Indian Wars, from 1642 to 1698. The Algonquin tribe supported the French because they had good trade relationships with them. The Algonquin fought against the Mohawk.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • By the end of the nineteenth century, the american west was firmly tied to the increasingly powerful industrial economy of the e
    14·1 answer
  • In 1951, president harry truman relieved general douglas macarthur of command because macarthur select one:
    11·1 answer
  • Why did arab nations place an oil embargo on the united states in 1973?
    10·1 answer
  • In what ways did the Phoenicians impact the Mediterranean world????
    6·1 answer
  • What trait was most important to Genghis Khan when promoting generals?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the ascension of william and mary to the thrown of england known as
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the location of the Mayan civilization crucial to its development?
    7·1 answer
  • Commercial Capitalism was based on people buying and selling b. manufacturing goods. c. the factory system. d. the domestic syst
    8·1 answer
  • What is true about Samuel Adams e was a dramatic speaker and persuasive writer.
    15·1 answer
  • Can some plz help me on this ?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!