Answer:
<em>[The Suffrage and the Civil rights Movement] </em>
<em></em>
<em>(Reason's they are Alike):</em>
<em>1.</em>They are both Marches for Basically Freedom.
<em>2.</em>They both happened in the 1900's.
<em>3.</em>Both of the Movements are using banners and slogans to spread their message to civilians.
<em>4.</em>They are both peaceful and very well mannered.
<em>5.</em>The last similarity is that Both movements are protesting in the National's Capitol.
<em>(Reason's they are Different): </em>
<em>1.</em> In the suffrage Photo, Men wasn't apart of the march, instead they were more of spectating the whole thing.
<em>2.</em> Also in the suffrage photo it was just a small group Marching, not a huge one like the other Movement.
<em>3.</em> One group focuses on mainly particular goals while the other group uses slogans based on the French Revolution.
Answer:
they have same trafic laws by witch the spanish was to drive left while octopods ride quentitle so ur welcome to move freely
Explanation:
<span>From 1774 to 1789, the Continental Congress served as the government of the 13 American colonies and later the United States. The First Continental Congress, which was comprised of delegates from the colonies, met in 1774 in reaction to the Coercive Acts, a series of measures imposed by the British government on the colonies in response to their resistance to new taxes. In 1775, the Second Continental Congress convened after the American Revolutionary War (1775-83) had already begun. In 1776, it took the momentous step of declaring America’s independence from Britain. Five years later, the Congress ratified the first national constitution, the Articles of Confederation, under which the country would be governed until 1789, when it was replaced by the current U.S. Constitution.</span>
The President (Executive Branch) has the power to appoint US Supreme Court justices and other (Article III ) federal judges. subject to approval by the Senate. He can and does choose judges who subscribe to his own legal philosophy and so can possibly shape future court opinions. The judges serve for life and their stance on future cases is hard to predict in many cases.
The president can also grant pardons for federal offenses
One is the fact that the judicial branch needs the executive branch to enforce its decisions. As an example, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional in Brown v. Bd. of Education of Topeka, it took the President's ordering the National Guard out to make some states abide by the ruling. The Judicial Branch has no way to enforce its decisions without the executive's co-operation.. Another is the fact that it is the executive branch that nominates the judges in the first place. As a practical matter, presidents nominate persons who share the same political beliefs they do. This has the effect of creating (or trying to create) a judicial branch that will interpret the Constitution the way that that president would like. Trouble is, once a Supreme Court Justice is confirmed, nothing can be done to force him or her to rule in a particular way. They are appointed with lifetime tenure on good behavior and their salaries cannot be diminished while they are in office.. And as to salaries, nothing says a president has to include raises for them in any budget he proposes.
The Executive branch gets to choose candidates for federal judgeships, including Supreme Court Justices. The President also has the power to pardon people convicted of federal offenses, Since the President controls the Department of Justice, he has some leeway in how laws are enforced.
