The statement about Du Halfe that would lead historians to question the objectivity of his portrayal of the scholars is that he was Jesuit and based his book on Jesuit missionary reports
<h3>What is a Factual Statement? </h3>
This refers to type of statement that is accurate and can be relied on for academic purposes.
Hence, we can see that from the complete text, even though the statements about Du Halde are factually accurate, one can question the objectivity.
This is because of his portrayal of the scholars that he was Jesuit and based his book on Jesuit missionary reports
Read more about factually accurate statements here:
brainly.com/question/1343499
#SPJ11
Answer:
It's True. They were trying to prevent blacks from having more power than whites.
Merchant and elites: freedom from mercantilism
others: equality before the law
Answer:
Americans greatly affected the end of WWI because they broke the stalemate. Until the entry of the U.S. in 1917, WW1 was in a stalemate. Each side literally traded yards of territory from one day to the next. There was no progress. When the U.S. joined they brought with them a large amount of soldiers. It was more a game of numbers than battles once the U.S. arrived. Germany's position quickly became untenable and well before the armistice, they were asking for peace.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
