1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dima020 [189]
3 years ago
10

Should the people who created the new policy of separating families when someone crossed the US border without proper paperwork,

even if
they were asking for amnesty, be held accountable?
In other words, should the people who made this new rule have to face punishment for taking children from their parents and keeping them in
the US while their parents cannot be located? (Read the article but some of these children have been separated from their parents for TWO
years.)
OR
Is it the parents fault for coming here expecting amnesty or without proper paperwork and there should be no punishment of US officials who
created this policy?
Search entries or author
Unread
Reply
Replies are only visible to those who have posted at least one reply.
History
1 answer:
Nastasia [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Not at all/ hope this hepled

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Freedom of speech may be limited during times of war.<br> true or false
Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

Explanation:

True.

What one says can make an enemy sympathizer happy to hear. A mother could talk about the socks she's knitting for you grandson, a father could talk about the truck's engine being hard to start (with no other details), but it was forbidden to talk about things that give away troop movements or anything that might be useful to the enemy. They would love to know that there were ships leaving the Baltimore harbor. The submarines would be there waiting for them.

In some cases it would be considered to be treason to divulge certain information, so your freedom of speech is severely limited.

7 0
3 years ago
Two important developments of Charles II's reign included:
Dimas [21]
Your answers are...

Habeas Corpus Act
<span>Whig Party and Tory Party</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Buenas noches puntosssssssssssss​
Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

buenas nocheeeeeees

Explanation:

xdsddddddd

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5+7=?<br><br>tysm! have a nice evening
Setler [38]

5 + 7 = 12
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
: All of the following were considered weaknesses under the Articles of Confederation EXCEPT
Verdich [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

I believe the answer is C. under the articles of confederation there were many things the federal government couldn’t do. However the voting process was virtually unaffected.

pls report if i’m wrong, hope dis helps.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Industrial Revolution was___ years apart
    5·1 answer
  • The Haymarket affair: Group of answer choices was started by the Knights of Labor. was blamed on seven anarchist leaders despite
    12·1 answer
  • What did the League of Nations do after the Italian invasion of Ethiopia?
    9·1 answer
  • • 19th Century Reform Movements Question: Of the Utopian communities which wanted to separate themselves from the new world of i
    9·1 answer
  • How are surplus and division of labor important to early man?
    6·1 answer
  • Government can best be described as __________.
    5·2 answers
  • Match the branch of government to the building
    10·1 answer
  • How did the ancient Romans leave a legal legacy for future governments?
    8·1 answer
  • The relationship between voltage, e, current, i, and resistance, z, is given by the equation e = iz. if a circuit has a current
    12·2 answers
  • A. Which two sides fought during the First World War? Central Powers and The Allied<br> Powers.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!