I assume your question is why does he have to leave the room before the final discussion?
Well, he might have, as an active member of the IRB, a conflict of interest, meaning that he could be biased to vote in favor of his work which is incorrect, as researchers need to be objective regarding what they are studying. The National Academy Press. (2009). On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Is a great book you might read to understand the duties of any IRB and its members responsibilities, also the researchers' behavior. On it, is detail why a conflict of interest can guide to the decision of not conducting a certain research, independently of the undeniable reputation of Dr. Jones.
Melanie is using<u> "critical" </u>thinking.
Critical thinking is the capacity to think what to do or what to accept. It incorporates the capacity to take part in intelligent and independent reasoning.
Critical thinking doesn't involve accumulating data. A man with a good memory and who knows a great deal of realities isn't really great at basic reasoning. A basic mastermind can find outcomes from what he knows, and he knows how to make utilization of data to take care of issues, and to look for relevant sources of data to educate himself.
Answer: Most research underreports the number of gays and lesbians in a population.
Answer: Japan
Explanation: During WWII, Japan was in the war and used Korea as a place for resources instead of their homeland because if something were to happen in japan the resources were going to be destroyed
