Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is option B) decrease.
Explanation:
Regressive tax is that of tax which is imposed in such manner that when the income level in the economy increases , the average tax rate would decrease. This type of tax has heavy burden on the low income people as it takes high proportion of their income. So it can be said here that there is an inverse relationship between tax payer's ability to pay ( which can be measured in income , assets or consumption) and the tax rates imposed.
Answer:
The answer is consumer's surplus
Explanation:
Consumer's surplus is the difference between what the consumer or buyer is willing to pay and the amount he or she eventually paid.
For example, Mr A is willing to pay $100 for a product and the producer is willing to sell for $90. After much negotiation between mr A and the seller, he eventually paid $85. What he paid was lower than what he was willing to pay before.
So the consumer surplus is $100 - $85 = $15
Answer:
Products that have neither immediate appeal nor long-run benefits
Explanation:
A product represents a bundle of utilities created by a producer to satisfy a want.
A deficient product as the name suggests, would refer to such products which are deficient in attributes that represent a customer want and the ones which fail to satisfy customer wants.
Those products who do not conform to a particular quality standard or whose performance is below par as per customer expectations would be termed as deficient products.
Sometimes, organizations deliberately create deficient products so as to induce repurchase of subsequent products depicted as improvements over the previous ones.
Such products lack current appeal and are neither expected to accrue to long term benefits.
Answer:
a) attached below.
b) for $x < $5000 will cause taking the drug to be part of the Nash equilibrium
c) will make the athletes feel better because the value their payoff will increase
Explanation:
<u>a) 2 * 2 payoff matrix describing the decision faced by the athletes </u>
attached below
when both players take the drug the payoff for each player = $5000 - x
when neither player takes the drug the payoff for each player = $5000
When only one player takes the drug his payoff = $10000 - x
<u>b) If we consider the value of $x to be involved in the Nash equilibrium then </u>
; $5000 - $x > 0 becomes the best response
hence for $x < $5000 will cause taking the drug to be part of the Nash equilibrium
c) Lowering the negative effect of the drug ( i.e. when the value of x is reduced )
will make the athletes feel better because the value their payoff will increase
