1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
madam [21]
3 years ago
6

The French Revolution began less than two decades after the American Revolution. In many ways, the American experience was an in

spiration for the citizens of France. But the people of the two countries had different situations and had different concerns, which influenced the way each revolution began, progressed, and ended. In this assignment, you will write an essay that compares and contrasts the two revolutions.
In your essay, include information on the economic, political, or social conditions that were present; events that took place as each revolution progressed; and the final outcome of each. Did the people achieve their original goals? Did their goals change? Were they satisfied with the outcome or did conditions worsen? To begin, consider the characteristics of each country such as the following:
• The status of ordinary citizens before the revolution
• The type of government in place
• The ability of the citizens to participate in their governance
• The people who stepped forward as leaders
• Taxes, laws, or social structure in place at the time
• The outcome of the revolution compared to its original goals
1. To help you organize your essay, first create an outline that includes these sections: these sections:
1. Introduction
2. Body (lost of points that show how the two Revolution were similar or different)
A. Similarities
B. Differences
3. Conclusion
Answer:
2. Now compose your essay based on the outline you created.
History
1 answer:
kow [346]3 years ago
5 0

the American Revolution and French Revolution were the products of Enlightenment ideals that emphasized the idea of natural rights and equality. With such an ideological basis, it becomes clear when one sets out to compare the French Revolution and American Revolution that people felt the need to be free from oppressive or tyrannical rule of absolute monarchs and have the ability to live independent from such forces. The leadership in both countries at the time of their revolutions was certainly repressive, especially in terms of taxation. Both areas suffered social and economic hardships that led to the realization that something must be done to topple the hierarchy and put power back into the hands of the people.

have a nice day love! (;

You might be interested in
100 POINTS I NEED HELP!!!! Canada has a Constitutional Monarchy (lead by a King/Queen but they don’t really have any power) were
Naya [18.7K]

Answer:

Toughie. Read this and maybe it'll help |

Explanation:                                            V

A constitutional monarchy is a form of monarchy in which the sovereign exercises authority in accordance with a written or unwritten constitution.[1] Constitutional monarchy differs from absolute monarchy (in which a monarch holds absolute power) in that constitutional monarchs are bound to exercise their powers and authorities within the limits prescribed within an established legal framework. Constitutional monarchies range from countries such as Monaco, Morocco, Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain, where the constitution grants substantial discretionary powers to the sovereign, to countries such as the United Kingdom, Spain, Belgium, Sweden and Japan, where the monarch retains no formal authorities.

Constitutional monarchy may refer to a system in which the monarch acts as a non-party political head of state under the constitution, whether written or unwritten.[2] While most monarchs may hold formal authority and the government may legally operate in the monarch's name, in the form typical in Europe the monarch no longer personally sets public policy or chooses political leaders. Political scientist Vernon Bogdanor, paraphrasing Thomas Macaulay, has defined a constitutional monarch as "A sovereign who reigns but does not rule".[3]

In addition to acting as a visible symbol of national unity, a constitutional monarch may hold formal powers such as dissolving parliament or giving royal assent to legislation. However, the exercise of such powers is largely strictly in accordance with either written constitutional principles or unwritten constitutional conventions, rather than any personal political preference imposed by the sovereign. In The English Constitution, British political theorist Walter Bagehot identified three main political rights which a constitutional monarch may freely exercise: the right to be consulted, the right to encourage, and the right to warn. Many constitutional monarchies still retain significant authorities or political influence however, such as through certain reserve powers, and may also play an important political role.

The United Kingdom and the other Commonwealth realms are all constitutional monarchies in the Westminster system of constitutional governance. Two constitutional monarchies – Malaysia and Cambodia – are elective monarchies, wherein the ruler is periodically selected by a small electoral college.

Strongly limited constitutional monarchies can be called crowned republics.

The concept of semi-constitutional monarchy identifies constitutional monarchies with less parliamentary powers.[4] Because of this, constitutional monarchies are also called 'parliamentary monarchies' to differentiate them from semi-constitutional monarchies.[5]

The oldest constitutional monarchy dating back to ancient times was that of the Hittites. They were an ancient Anatolian people that lived during the Bronze Age whose king or queen had to share their authority with an assembly, called the Panku, which was the equivalent to a modern-day deliberative assembly or a legislature. Members of the Panku came from scattered noble families who worked as representatives of their subjects in an adjutant or subaltern federal-type landscape.[6][7]

Constitutional and absolute monarchy

England, Scotland and the United Kingdom

In the Kingdom of England, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 led to a constitutional monarchy restricted by laws such as the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701, although limits on the power of the monarch ("a limited monarchy") are much older than that (see Magna Carta). At the same time, in Scotland, the Convention of Estates enacted the Claim of Right Act 1689, which placed similar limits on the Scottish monarchy.

There are currently 43 monarchies worldwide.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following purposes was the colony of Georgia founded?
Goryan [66]

 Georgia was established  to protect South Carolina and other southern colonies from Spanish invasion through Florida

4 0
3 years ago
Forty years after his conviction, Fred Korematsu once again decided to challenge it. Korematsu's conviction was overturned by th
trasher [3.6K]

Answer: About 10 weeks after the U.S. entered World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942 signed Executive Order 9066. The order authorized the Secretary of War and the armed forces to remove people of Japanese ancestry from what they designated as military areas and surrounding communities in the United States. These areas were legally off limits to Japanese aliens and Japanese-American citizens.

The order set in motion the mass transportation and relocation of more than 120,000 Japanese people to sites the government called detention camps that were set up and occupied in about 14 weeks. Most of the people who were relocated lived on the West Coast and two-thirds were American citizens. In accordance with the order, the military transported them to some 26 sites in seven western states, including remote locations in Washington, Idaho, Utah, and Arizona.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why is grassroots organizing considered a form of “indirect lobbying”
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Since direct lobbying is paying lobbyists to talk to representatives and make deals to pass legislation or protect legislation, indirect lobbying organizations uses their followers to call or write the representatives about the issues the voters want to see/legislation they want passed

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Spanish originally settled all of the following areas except:
Andrew [12]
The Spanish originally settled in both San Diego and Flordia but They did not originally settle in Kansas.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Before the cotton gin, how long would it take a skilled person to remove the seeds from one pound of cotton?
    12·2 answers
  • What did the pilgrims name their colony
    15·1 answer
  • An economic effect of the French and Indian war on America colonists was that
    13·1 answer
  • What was the basic message that Jesus preached ? Now and why did that message spread ?
    9·2 answers
  • Which best describes the workers who were associated with the Pullman Strike of 1894?
    14·1 answer
  • Need Help ASAP!!!
    13·2 answers
  • How would Stephen Douglas most likely respond to this statement?
    14·2 answers
  • Most of the oil was found in the hills of Spindletop which is in _______ Texas
    14·1 answer
  • The perimeter of a rectangular flower bed is 26 m.
    13·1 answer
  • During the Revolutionary War, Loyalists and Patriots most disagreed about
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!