1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mkey [24]
3 years ago
10

Should a principal or other school authority be able to silence other forms of student speech? If so, under what conditions? How

does speech by an individual student differ from speech by the school newspaper?
Social Studies
2 answers:
Alja [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Us humans have the rights to speak loud upon our opinion no matter our age. Adults think of us as childish and we don't know the way of the world making others believe the school opinion.

Lelu [443]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

i agree with Aliz39 , she is soo right . they always want to shut us down

You might be interested in
One result of the expanding railroad system was that?
Brut [27]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Essentialism explains ____________ phenomena in terms of ____________ ones.
Gwar [14]
<span>Essentialism explains "Social" phenomena in terms of "Natural" ones.

</span><span>In social and political deliberations, the evaluate of essentialism emerged from post-modernist theory, as indicated by which the essentialist see on gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, or other gathering attributes is that they are fixed characteristics, marking down variety among individuals as secondary.
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
I have horrible dark humor....bro its so bad..
tamaranim1 [39]
Its really good not bad
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
_____ occurs when the shoulder blades move toward the midline.
kupik [55]

Answer:

A is the best answer for this question.

Explanation:

scapular depression.

4 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Fieser, what two modifications did kant make to his examples regarding the formula of the law of nature? and, when we modify kan
    8·1 answer
  • When intrapersonal conflicts challenge individuals to choose between right and right, the decision presents _____?
    5·1 answer
  • As a child Dan loved to prance around the neighborhood wearing silly outfits. As he got older he realized that he couldn't conti
    9·1 answer
  • ____ region has the maximum concentration of iron and steel industries <br> ​
    15·1 answer
  • The black market is most active in a __________ economy.
    13·2 answers
  • The Federalists tended to side more with Britain in their war with France True False
    5·1 answer
  • 17. Present the foilowing information in a pie chart.
    15·1 answer
  • Which most likely explains why some countries lack opposition parties? A.They lack popular support. B.They destroy the election
    7·2 answers
  • if there is no inventory to move around, there is no need for logistics. do you agree ? why ? why not ?
    10·2 answers
  • Identify at least four major contemporary global issues and explain their influences on ethiopia
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!