Virtual learning was a modality that most students, until then, did not know. However, the moment in which we are living and the need for social distancing made virtual learning not just a necessity, but the only type of teaching allowed.
Although it may seem like a promising system, virtual learning has raised questions that are likely to shape the future of schools and education not only in the country, but worldwide. It is now questionable whether virtual learning is really effective and whether it will be able to prepare students for higher academic and professional levels. This is because it distances the student from the teacher, decreasing the ability to exclude doubts from them, in addition to being a type of learning that is constantly susceptible to distractions, since it is not carried out in an environment suitable for this. In addition, not all the population that needs to study has access to the devices needed for virtual learning. We must not forget that this type of service makes the teaching service more expensive, since it guarantees an even greater workload.
With this, we can say that virtual learning promotes a higher expenditure on education in exchange for a less qualified education and therefore should not be adopted as a substitute for traditional education in the future. However, we know that virtual learning has some advantages, which may justify its fusion with conventional learning in some factors, as long as this allows education in a country to be more inclusive, efficient and egalitarian.
Answer:
You know this reminded me of the F.U.N song from spongebob lol.
F. is for friends who do stuff together
U. is for u and me
N. SoMetHiNg i forgott....
ANYWAYS
the answer to you question is:
<u>Friendship essentially involves a distinctive kind of concern for someone, a concern which might reasonably be understood as a kind of love.</u>
Explanation:
<em>Hope this helps :}</em>
<em>Pls mark brainliest :P</em>
<em>And have an amazing day <3</em>
Brackets. in quotes, square brackets show that the writer changed the original source. you might use them to change an ambiguous pronoun (such as "he" or "they") to a specific person or group (such as "abraham lincoln" or "school teachers"). they're also used to modify the phrasing of the original source to fit your sentence, such as changing a verb from from present tense to past tense.
Answer:
if someone or something is defending or fighting with the heart of a warrior, this means that they have the same passion as a warrior does as he goes into battle. "passion" is one of your choices, so i'd definitely mark that one, because the guard dog is using the same ferocity and passion that a warrior would. "heart" in this case also refers to "courage" and "spirit." one way to answer this question is to try and swap out the word "heart" for any of the answer choices, and see which ones help the sentence keep the same meaning.
a dog fighting with the passion of a warrior still gives you the same vibe as a dog fighting with the heart of a warrior. a dog fighting with the courage of a warrior also gives you the same impression, a guard dog with the spirit of a warrior as well.
Explanation: