The correct answer is "Sweatt ruled that “separate but equal” graduate and professional schools were constitutional. Brown overturned that decision."
<em>"Sweatt vs Painter" </em>ruling was successful in challenging the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by previous case "Plessy vs Fergusson". Sweatt ultimately won the case when the Supreme Court concluded that Thurgood Marshall School of Law failed to qualify for being a "separate but equal" educational institution, as it lacked the sufficient facilities to become one.
<em>"Brown vs Board of Education"</em> ruling effectively overturned the ruling of the <em>"Plessy vs Fergusson case"</em>, when the Supreme Court indicated that state laws that permitted separate public schools were unconstitutional.
Answer:
A home rule is the government of a colony, dependent country, or region by its own citizens.
Explanation:
The correct answers are map making, compasses, and square sails .
Map making made significant progress during the Age of Exploration (when Europeans were sailing to Asia). Thanks to maps that accurately included North and South America and their separation from Asia, sailors were better able to navigate their way around the globe.
Compasses also helped tremendously. These devices helped sailors to find their bearings and assess what direction they were heading.
Lastly, square sails helped in the process of traveling from Europe to Asia. During this period, caravels became ships developed by the Portuguese. These easily movable ships often used square sails as a means to direct their boat.
Answer:
Pierre Le Moyne founded the French colony of Louisiana and the first European settlement in what is now Mississippi at Biloxi in 1699.
In order to paraphrase a text you should understand each paragraph's main ideas and then think of other citations and examples of your own to complete the logic of it.
1 - The Beard interpretation has two main problems: first, there isn’t in the Constitution any confession or strong sign of the influence from those who believed the fundamental private rights of property being fundamentally anterior to government and morally unreachable for the popular majorities; second, it is impossible to deny the Constitution as a document in federalism.
2 - These problems should be addressed. The second is simple for it is consensual amongst Revolutionary era historians that the big question of that moment was: how to articulate diverse parts of an empire towards common purposes? And how to realize that articulation without taking one side more than another, without transforming demands for liberty and autonomy into central government undermining. It can be argued that’s the same debate over Federal aid to education.
3 - The Declaratory Act was a declaration of the British failure in solving this same problem, about which Edmund Burke sharply observed the impossibility of arguing anyone into slavery. When it was time for Americans to deal with this dilemma the Articles of Confederation were adequate when discussing the distribution of powers but lacking in sanctions. This deficiency was the cause of the Philadelphia Convention.
4 - Although Beard’s interpretation is convincing when arguing that those who wrote the Constitution belonged to the propertied classes, he is not as convincing about this being reflected on the Constitution itself. If the framers were trying to protect their property they didn’t succeed. Our analysis of the Economic Interpretation of the Constitution shows that the auteur’s reading of that historical moment fails to legitimate itself when confronted with the Constitution’s text. What each of the framers did after the Constitution and how it was directly linked to his class isn’t enough proof of the auteur’s argument if it isn’t shown also through the Constitution.
