Most studies say so! Our verbal language is around 10% from what we actually communicate! Most of the job is done by nonverbal language, or body language! So there os no big stretch to belive that it is true.
In ancient times, Sparta took up far more territory on land, which gave them a slight military advantage, but Athens had far more naval power, but evened the playing field slightly.
The answer would be:<span>. an emphasis on tasks, a focus on more distant goals, and a concern for the external relationship between one's family and other social institutions.
According to them, expressiveness refers to someone's tendency to openly pursuing their own life dreams that derive from each unique individuals. This life dreams could take in various forms, whether it's career, relationship, or societal status.</span>
The correct answer of the given question above would be the AFRICAN AMERICANS. The group that gained more political participation when <span>amendments were added to the constitution were the African Americans. Other choices for this question include native Americans, Asian Americans and Hispanic Americans. Hope this answer helps.</span>
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
