1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inessa05 [86]
2 years ago
7

What must happen before you can bring your case to the Supreme Court?

History
1 answer:
UkoKoshka [18]2 years ago
7 0
Before bringing the case to the Supreme Court the case must be approved by the advocate
There should be some proof too
You might be interested in
Which civilization did NOT practice slavery?<br> Anasazi<br> Aztec<br> Incan
Shtirlitz [24]

Hello! Your answer is anasazi!

I had this question and I read the lesson and your answer is anasazi!

Explanation:

The aztecs and incans DID in fact practice slavery. The person above me is wrong but I know im right because I got this right.

Please mark brainliest tyvm!

Have a wonderful day<3

6 0
2 years ago
The ultimate goal for the english in gaining new amsterdam and new netherland from the dutch was to:
ser-zykov [4K]

they were interested in the fur trade more than anything else

4 0
2 years ago
Why was there tension between the US and the USSR after World War II?
gogolik [260]
<span>Background of US conflict with Soviet. During World War II, Roosevelt followed a policy of "the Grand Alliance" with the determination to get along with the Soviet Union. He was determined to follow this policy after the war and believed the United Nations, one of his pet projects, would maintain the postwar peace.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What statement shows the reason African slaves were brought into the British colonies in Southern North America in the 17th cent
slavikrds [6]
The southern colonies' economy had growing labor demands

This is because the South's economy relied on the agriculture, which required more physical labor than the industrial factories the North relied on.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
• Do you think the Sedition Act was necessary? Why or why not?
Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

No, I do not think it was necessary.

Explanation:

The Sedition act was uncharacteristic of the initial thoughts of the forefathers of the United States because it went against the freedom of speech and freedom of press. Although it seemed to be a quick fix to stop dissention in the U.S. with anti war sentiment, it also invalidated the very constitution for which the U.S stood on. There could have been better ways to handle it such as educating the public better on what exactly was happening, and why we might as a country needed to become involved in the war.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the fall of communism affected Europe
    9·1 answer
  • Please HELP ME
    12·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of FDR and Churchill’s Atlantic Charters purpose
    8·1 answer
  • Why was it important for the secretary of war to speak to the public about the sites where the atomic bombs were made?
    6·1 answer
  • Who stated in his leviathan that citizens must submit to a powerful absolute monarch to prevent anarchy?
    15·1 answer
  • New England towns were clustered around an area called the
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be a short-term public policy?
    12·1 answer
  • Conflict between settlers and American Indians occurred after...
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true of the Kennedy and Johnson Administration?
    6·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE THIS IS DUE SOON AND I HAVE NO IDEA :,(
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!