1) it is persuasive because it talks about the positives of joining the league. We can use it to our advantage by what the league can influence.
2) it is persuasive because it used an scare tactic to to warn us that without the league, the world will fail. We can use this to advantage by knowing the concerns and what would happen if we don’t have support from the league
3) this arguement is persuasive because it tells us what it will allow. We can use it to our advantage by bringing “peace throughout the world”
This is what I would put tbh you’d make around probably an 80
Answer:
Which of the following events was a consequence of the Enlightenment?
this is the answer = French citizens rebelled against the French monarchy and established a representative form of government.
Explanation:
Answer:
Albert dussel is an elderly dentist who joins the Frank family and the Van Daans in the annex. He and Anne share a room and as we can see from her accounts,they both despise each other.Anne hates not having her room all too herself and Mr. dussel who feels very lonely doesn't like sharing a room with anne because she is too noisy and spunky according to him(She is misunderstood).
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
genocide was initially defined as the intentional destruction of people because of their race, religion, ethnicity, or other permanent group membership.The killing of one person by another is murder whether done because the victim was Black or White, refused to repay a loan, or hurled an insult. It is murder if the killing was a premeditated act or the person died because of a reckless and wanton disregard for their life. Nor does it matter whether the killing is done for high moral ends, for altruistic reasons, or for any other purpose, it is murder under Western and most other legal codes (unless officially authorized by government, as for judicial executions or military combat). And as a crime murder is limited by definition to taking the life of another in some way. Although we use murder metaphorically, as in someone "murdering" the language, it is not the crime of murder to hurt someone psychological, to steal their child, or to rob them of their culture.
I believe the answer is: C: The articles threatened national security
According to the national defense departement, publishing articles regarding Military tactics in vietnam war would potentially endanger the troops in vietnam. We cannot know if vietnam troops have any spies in national soil, so as a precaution, the articles is banned from being published.