1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
professor190 [17]
3 years ago
10

Why was it Western Europe rather than China, the Muslim world, or some other non-Western society who effected the globalization

era of the sixteenth century? Be specific. B. What were the possible factors that allowed some non-western societies to resist or cope with the arrival of Westerners better than others? Give examples.
History
1 answer:
WARRIOR [948]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A Military strength and Imperialism

B Religion, Unity, Organization

Explanation:

A The sixteenth century saw the rise of  European imperialism, protagonized by the Spanish who had just reconquered the Iberian peninsula on the Arabs. The Muslim world was in retreat, China was isolated.

The military (tecnological) supremacy of the Spanish in the Americas was overwhelming and the Indians, both in North & South America, were easily conquered.

B Take the negative example of the Aztecs in México: their religion  hampered their military organization. They were united as a tribe but other tribes, like the Tlaxcaltecas, were ready to help Cortés a hand in destroying the Aztec empire.

Now a positive example, i.e. resisting or coping with the arrival of Westerners, is more difficult to find. In any case they are more likely to be found in Asia, where powerful and united nations (socially and religiously) such as China or Japan proved to be more resistent than their fellow-countries in Africa or the Americas.

You might be interested in
Imagine you are an Underground Railroad conductor. Create three to five journal entries of three to five sentences each about yo
Oksanka [162]

Answer:

June 31st 1859 , I was helping some slaves make it up north to newyork when we were stopped by a slave catcher. My lungs longed for air as i hoped he moved along so I can see my son in Newyork. We made it to Kentucky where i was informed that the slaves i had helped escape last month were caught and tooken back to the plantation and beaten. I work on a plantation Here in Kentucky and I feed the slaves good

fresh food in plantations all over and I haven't been caught Yet.

Hope this helps !

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The passage of alien and sedition acts led directly to what?
Elina [12.6K]

i put conflict or solution and got it right but idk the answer choices so ......

7 0
3 years ago
Which fact provides the BEST evidence to support the conclusion that the most important successes of Jimmy Carter's presidency w
AveGali [126]

The answer to choose:  A) Carter was instrumental in negotiating the Camp David Accords, which directly led to the 1979 Egypt-Israeli Peace Treaty.

Details:

Thanks to the persistent efforts of President Carter in working with Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, those two leaers signed the Camp David Accords in September, 1978.   That led to the 1979 peace treaty between Egypt and Israel that has lasted to the present day.  Sadat and Begin were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1978 for their efforts in reaching the agreement that they made.

As to the other answers:  

The fact that Carter allowed the deposed shah of Iran to come into the USA for medical treatment did provoke the hostage seizure in Tehran.  However, that was not a major <u>success</u> of Carter's foreign policy, but a major mistake. (His advisors had tried to tell him in advance that letting the shah come into the US was a bad idea.)

Similarly, the increase of tensions with the Soviet Union over the Olympics would not be an example of a success.

The federal law regarding cleaning up hazardous waste would be a success item, but one of <u>domestic</u> policy, not foreign policy.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the British respond to Canadians' desire for self-rule?
belka [17]

Answer:

How did the British respond to the Canadians desire for self-rule? Britain finally agreed to a confederation of Britain''s North American colonies and Parliament passed a law that created the Dominion of Canada. ... Britain agreed to Australian demands for self-rule.

7 0
3 years ago
Who are the pawnee people?
Serga [27]
The Pawnee is a Native American tribe in Nebraska and Kansas. But in 1874, they've been moved to Oklahoma. They used to serve the Army against the European expansion.

Hope this Helps! :)
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • • What types of jobs did slaves do in each colonial region: New England, Middle and the South?
    10·1 answer
  • How did political and economic life change during the Cold War years in the United states
    10·1 answer
  • What happens during inflation?
    13·2 answers
  • What political party suffered due to their lack of nationalism during and after the war of 1812
    10·1 answer
  • How does the principle of federalism affect the U.S. government?
    15·2 answers
  • Why were farmers having a hard time in the<br> Midwest during Westward Expansion?
    6·2 answers
  • What are some things the united states learned during the space race
    14·1 answer
  • Jamestown survived its early years because of the aid given by the Native American chief called:
    9·2 answers
  • What was James Wilson’s most notable contribution to the drafting of the Constitution?
    7·2 answers
  • Brainliest answer goes to whoever can answer ALL the blanks.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!