1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VikaD [51]
3 years ago
11

Which best describes why some people such as James Madison thought that the Bill of Rights was unnecessary?

History
2 answers:
Lubov Fominskaja [6]3 years ago
4 0
People such as James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton thought of Bill of Rights as dangerous and simply useless. Their main argument was that everything that was not listed under the Bill of Rights would be a subject of neglecting in case the government decides to find a loophole in its own system. 

Kaylis [27]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is number one believe me that is your answer
You might be interested in
how did the british forces further pummel the american morale after defeating the us troops at canada and bladensburg
kari74 [83]
<span>British troops advanced to Washington DC and burned the White House, the Capitol, and other significant structures.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Martin luther king, jr. would most likely have condoned which type of protest?
raketka [301]

Martin Luther king, jr. would most likely have condoned a protest whose aim is to prevent racism against African Americans.

<h3>Who was Martin Luther King Jr</h3>

Martin Luther King Jr. an American of African decent who was a social activist and Baptist minister.

He  played a crucial role in the American civil rights movement from the mid-1950s until his assassination in 1968.

 His ideologies about achieving human rights justice was centered around peace and a non-violent nature.

Learn more about Martin Luther King Jr at brainly.com/question/17746240

#SPJ12

4 0
2 years ago
Q: which of the following is NOT true of the compromise of 1877
Solnce55 [7]

Samuel Tilden won the 1876 presidential election after a recount

Explanation:

  • The 1877 compromise is unusual because it was not reached after an open debate in the US Congress. It was primarily made behind the scenes and there are hardly any written records. It emerged from a contentious presidential election that was, however, harsh with the old North vs. South problems, this time involving the last three southern states that still controlled Republican reconstruction governments.
  • The timing of the treaty was prompted by the presidential election of 1876 between Democrat Samuel B. Tilden, governor of New York, and Republican Rutherford B. Hayes, governor of Ohio.
  • When the votes were counted, Tilden led Hayes by one vote in the Electoral College. But Republicans accused Democrats of voting for fraud, saying they intimidated African-American voters in three southern states, Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina, and prevented them from voting, thereby defrauding Tilden's election surrender.

Learn more on Rutherford Hayes on

brainly.com/question/522546

brainly.com/question/10331300

#learnwithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
The Constitution gives the federal goverment many important duties: making laws, raising money and deciding how to
Mama L [17]

Answer:

National defense is the priority job of the national government.

National defense is the only mandatory function of the national government. Most of the powers granted to Congress are permissive in nature. Congress is given certain authorities but not required by the Constitution to exercise them. For example, Article One, Section Eight gives Congress power to pass a bankruptcy code, but Congress actually did not enact bankruptcy laws until well into the 19th century.

But the Constitution does require the federal government to protect the nation. Article Four, Section Four states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.” In other words, even if the federal government chose to exercise no other power, it must, under the Constitution, provide for the common defense.

National defense is exclusively the function of the national government. Under our Constitution, the states are generally sovereign, which means that the legitimate functions of government not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the states. But Article One, Section 10 does specifically prohibit the states, except with the consent of Congress, from keeping troops or warships in time of peace or engaging in war, the only exception being that states may act on their own if actually invaded. (This was necessary because, when the Constitution was written, primitive forms of communication and transportation meant that it could take weeks before Washington was even notified of an invasion.)

The great irony of our time is that the bigger the federal government has become, the less well it has performed its priority function of providing for the national defense. For example, Congress spent $787 billion in the “stimulus” bill last year, yet not a dime of it was spent on military procurement or modernization—despite the fact that America is in greater danger today than it has been at any time since Communism was threatening Europe in the late 1940s.

The Heritage Foundation has written extensively on the risks facing America and the state of our defenses. Here is a brief summary of the salient facts.

America has no strategy for victory in the war on terrorism—we’re not even calling it a war anymore—and the momentum has shifted to the terrorists. The outcome in Afghanistan is in doubt. If the terrorists succeed there, they can reconstitute their safe havens, plan further attacks on the United States, and threaten to gain control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

The Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, a bipartisan commission with the status of the 9/11 Commission, found unanimously that the terrorists would “more likely than not” develop and use a weapon of mass destruction against a Western city by 2013. The Director of National Intelligence publicly agreed with that assessment.

The international regime for controlling nuclear weapons is broken. Pakistan has a substantial and growing nuclear arsenal. Its intelligence organization has been penetrated by the Islamists. Both North Korea and Iran are steadily increasing the range, payload, and accuracy of their ballistic missiles. No one seriously believes that the Iranians will voluntarily stop their nuclear program or that the West (except perhaps the Israelis) will use force to stop them.

According to our Pacific commander, China is increasing its military strength far more quickly than our intelligence predicted. The Chinese have already acquired an arsenal of advanced fighters and missiles that threatens to deny the American Navy access to the Taiwan Strait. They are building as many as five submarines per year and have established a modern submarine base on the island of Hainan. They have announced plans to build a variety of the ships necessary to field a blue water capability.  

The American military is significantly weaker than it was at the end of the Cold War.  Most of our tankers are equally as old; they will not be replaced, if at all, until the 2030s. The Department of Defense wants to close our most modern cargo aircraft production line and will close our most sophisticated fighter line. The missile defense budget has been cut, and according to most reports, the Obama Administration will cut modernization budgets even further.

As important as it is for the federal government to restrain itself from interfering where it does not belong, it is equally important that the government perform its constitutionally mandated function of providing for the national defense.

America’s global influence is being checked and rolled back, and even the homeland is no longer safe from attack.

The situation can still be recovered, but only if our leaders understand their duty, regain their confidence, and reenergize the defense of freedom here and abroad.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the Arabian Peninsula’s location affect ability to trade?
Stella [2.4K]
"<span>c. Its proximity to Africa and India made trade quite successful" is the best option, since a great deal of trade during this time and indeed today is done with ships. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When did Romania become a communist country? War of 1812 World War II World War I Hundred Year War
    6·2 answers
  • What events led to the weakening of the spanish empire
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is depicted in the image above?
    11·2 answers
  • Write an essay on the history of baseball. it can be 3/4 or to the bottom of the page
    14·1 answer
  • President Adams sought a peaceful solution to the undeclared war with France in order to a. ensure his chances of reelection in
    14·2 answers
  • What have some archeologists suspected was true after studying the stone sculptures of the olmec civilization?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the significance of political parties in the late nineteenth century?
    11·1 answer
  • 1949<br> Puppasayaiyeeye emaross<br> D<br> Please help
    13·1 answer
  • Will give brainliest!!
    5·2 answers
  • Describe the image for 50 points
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!