45 countries and 36 colonies
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You do not include any reference to what argument, text, or paper written by James Madison, because he wrote many as part of the authors of the Federalists papers.
However, probably you are referring to "Federalist N.-10." If this is the case, then the correct answer is the following.
Madison used the comparison to bolster his argument in that he compares two forms of government: Republic and Pure Democracy. In that comparison, James Madison says that the wrongdoings and failures of Pure Democracy represent the benefits of a Republic. So he tries to promote the idea of a Republic as the new form of government for the new nation.
The correct answer is Humans and chimpanzees have DNA that is very similar because they both evolved from a common ancestor.
Explanation:
Both humans and chimpanzees are primates; this means both species belong to the same biological order (rank in taxonomy). Moreover, humans and chimpanzees share most of their DNA (around 99%). This indicates the two species are related and they evolved from the same ancestor. This implies a primate that existed million years ago (common ancestor) was the origin of these two species and due to this common ancestor they share most of their DNA; however, as both species changed separately the remaining DNA is different and this makes both species look and be different. According to this, the correct statement about the evolution of primates is "Humans and chimpanzees have DNA that is very similar because they both evolved from a common ancestor."
Explanation:
In Stage 5 of the DTM a country experiences loss to the overall population as the death rate becomes higher than the birth rate. The negative population growth rate is not an immediate effect however.
Answer:
May 2, 2019 — Identifying the overall constitutional principle ... In League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, the ... v. Perry, the Court ruled that the map in Texas was not unconstitutional on ... A. One difference between Shaw v Reno and the mentioned court case is that in Shaw v Reno, the court decided that the.
Explanation: