Answer:
Jo agrees to marry Professor Bhaer but would not marry Laurie is explained below in detail.
Explanation:
She was reluctant to consider the approach of any sort of passionate connection but said she loved him devotedly and that she did not think to ever marry anyone, indicating she loved him as a friend. Yet she also stated she felt he was “a fabulous chance too good” for her and after the novel she admired him to be the kind of man all should want to be – so the “she did not acknowledge that way about him” line is need to be discussed. Nevertheless, how could she have come to consider whatever emotions she might have for him as “right,” given her mother’s logic and her lack of experience?
Answer:
The statement that "best describes Edwards's views" in 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God' is 'People who were "born again" in Christ would be spared'. EXPLANATION: Jonathan Edward's lecture depicts God as a furious and supreme one yet he is a loving and infinite
<span>I do not understand Spanish: is what that means :) hope this helps!</span>
