Cancel culture hasn't taken a huge effect on history other than "canceling" figures such as Christopher Columbus. Multiple monuments have been toppled or graffitied on that represent the dark spots in history, such as confederate leaders, colonizers, etc. Though the context in history books have not changed as much. Removing history from the books is no the responsibility of cancel culture. Cancel culture could be a possible threat to learning true history and how we came to be. We must learn true history to not make the same mistakes we did in the past. History will repeat itself.
B. False
After President Roosevelt contracted polio, he learned to walk with leg braces and entered politics, becoming governor of New York and later President of the United States.
Answer:
None of the above.
Explanation:
Intercultural communication, that is, the communicational and informational exchange between members of different cultural groups, has always been very important in the history of the United States, given its main characteristic of melting pot or multicultural nation.
Thus, during the colonial era, the cultural clash between the British, the natives and the Africans implied a necessary interaction between these groups, with obvious and manifest differences in power between them; In the era of industrialization, the arrival of foreign and internal immigrants meant a mixture of different cultures and their consequent interrelation; While at present, although the American culture is much more homogeneous as a result of this unification, there are still different cultural groups such as Latinos, African Americans, etc., which are interrelated.
They both have a type of republic for their government
When Bill Clinton ran for President in 1992, Democratic strategist James
Carville famously posted a large sign in the campaign’s “war room” that
read: “It’s the economy, stupid!”
