I believe the answer would be "D. civil rights for minorities."
For a little background, Suzanna Hupp is a former Republican member of the Texas House of Representatives and <span>a strong, leading advocate of a 1991 bill for citizens' rights to carry </span><span>concealed weapons. She has written a book detailing her experience post-Luby's massacre and how she ended up in Texas's House of Representatives.
Anyway, Susan Gratia-Hupp's definition of the 2nd Amendment was that it was not for recreational purposes like hunting, but rather for self-defense. The constitutional and congressional definition did not specify self-defense vs. recreational purpose. This helped her significantly in the fight for concealed weapons.
Hope I could help!</span>
The option that completes the diagram is the following:
B. The museum argues that the language is not obscene because it has artistic merit.
The first point of the diagram adds the important detail that the language used is a quotation of an artist, so B is the logical point to add to the diagram.
Answer:
It could still work wonderfully if everyone didn't whine and want to cancel things that upsets them or is an opposing view as theirs.
Explanation: