1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dimas [21]
3 years ago
7

Among instances of corporate malfeasance in the early twenty-first century, the _______ scandal was the most shocking and econom

ically damaging for employees and shareholders.
a. WorldCom
b. Enron
c. Tyco International
d. American Tobacco
History
1 answer:
xxMikexx [17]3 years ago
6 0
Among instances of corporate malfeasance in the early twenty-first century, the "Enron" scandal was the most shocking and economically damaging for <span>employees and shareholders, since it was thought that corporations that were so large could not fail. </span>
You might be interested in
Although the language in the constitution is seemingly very clear about the freedom of the press, in practice, the freedom of th
guajiro [1.7K]
A court case that was one over by the government.
8 0
3 years ago
Why did people in the sunbelt tend to be conservative?
faltersainse [42]
The conservatives believe that conservatism can make them be closer to God and the truth which makes them have better decisions. It puts them to a higher plane to focus on the spiritual rather than materials things that are set by the world.
5 0
3 years ago
What type of government would you like to live in and why?
SashulF [63]

Explanation:

I want to live in democratic country because in democratic country the Peoplre only govern themselves by choosing their representatives

8 0
3 years ago
What was the ten commandments the eightfold path and the five pillars of faith known as
stira [4]
They are the guiding principles of their respective religions: Chirstianity, Buddhism and Islam. 
4 0
3 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do people say that World War II ended the Great Depression?
    11·1 answer
  • From FDRs first Fireside Chat to President Trump's active Twitter usage, presidents have used various forms of communication to
    5·2 answers
  • Document 9
    12·1 answer
  • Who were some of the important farmers?why are they called farmers
    14·2 answers
  • The graph uses large amounts of data.It is an example of which method of studying historical cause and effect?
    10·2 answers
  • What were the main characteristics of the affluent society of the 1950s?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the first major advance of the United States and the other Allied powers?
    15·2 answers
  • What new kinds of neighborhoods were created by local railroads?
    8·1 answer
  • Which country was MOST responsible for starting World War One? **I know it's Germany but I need a strong reason**
    12·1 answer
  • Who would be the most likely be a plebeian in the Roman Empire?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!