Why should historians avoid oversymplfying

English

2 answers:

aalyn [17]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The correct option is "A- Oversimplifications often ignore complex or condradictory evidence."

Historical sources constitute the raw material of History. They include all the documents, testimonies or objects that transmit us significant information regarding the events that have taken place, especially in the past. Within them, and considering the value that others also have, the written sources are the basic support to build history.

The historian works historical sources ("interrogates and contrasts") to obtain as much information from them as possible. It must also attend to its variety, making an adequate selection of them. In a general sense, historical sources are of two types: primary and secondary.

IgorC [24]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Answer is A

Explanation:

You might be interested in

As directed<br>1. He did his work<br>perfect.)<br>with diligence. Cchange into future

tiny-mole [99]

Answer:

he will do his work perfect with diligence

5 0

3 years ago

In "Life Without Go Go Boots,” what evidence does Kingsolver use to support her claim that her profession justifies her fashion

sashaice [31]

A) so many have so little

5 0

3 years ago

Question 17 of 20

goblinko [34]

Answer:

B.To Setup Trade

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Read the excerpt from “The Railroad Earth.”

larisa86 [58]

The answer is: minimal punctuation.

After reviewing the excerpt from “The Railroad Earth” by Jack Kerouac you can validate that there are no verses repeated, all the words used in this passage existed, no one was invented by Kerouac, in this part of the story it was not included any dialogue and there is only one comma used in all the lines, this shows Kerouac minimal punctuation style.

8 0

3 years ago

Can someone help me plz

gavmur [86]

Answer:

Explanation:

time has no pronouns so it goes by it

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers