You asked what I thought so I am going to give you my honest opinon. Emphasis on opinion
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
During the times of NAFTA, the North America Free Trade Agreement between México, Canada, and the United States, many people opposed the treaty and questioned President Bill Clinton about it.
Nader and Buchanan opposed the ratification of NAFTA. This influenced what Clinton said in his speech of September 14, 1993. On that day, President Clinton signed two supplements that were included in the Free Trade Agreement.
President Clinton’s speech addressed the arguments against NAFTA that Nader and Buchanan made in that hehe said it was not true that the trade meant just moving out jobs from the US to México. And he clearly explained that Mexicans with lower income than Germans or Europeans spent more in US products, more than those Europeans and Canadians.
the combination in one company of two or more stages of production normally operated by separate companies.
The Monroe Doctrine declared<span> that </span>an<span>y nation enacted any unwanted advances </span>among<span> the </span>New World<span> as an act of aggression toward the </span>united states<span>. </span><span>The </span>Monroe Doctrine conjointly believed that each country has a right to defend itself from any outside invasion. He also promised to protect America from the invasion of British or any other country to be its colony.<span> This was </span>an awfully generous<span> </span>supply to all or any collection<span> countries </span>among the Americas<span>.</span>
Here are at least two ways the colonists protested against the british and their response to the acts and taxes that the british set. hope this is helpful.
sugar act - protests and boycotts. colonists believe it is a violation of the right to trial by jury
stamp act - boycotts become widespread, "No Taxation without Representation", protest groups (sons and daughters of liberty) use violence against tax collectors.
