Answer:
The Chicago Fire of 1871, also called the Great Chicago Fire, burned from October 8 to October 10, 1871, and destroyed thousands of buildings, killed an estimated 300 people and caused an estimated $200 million in damages. Legend has it that a cow kicked over a lantern in a barn and started the fire, but other theories hold that humans or even a meteor might have been responsible for the event that left an area of about four miles long and almost a mile wide of the Windy City, including its business district, in ruins. Following the blaze, reconstruction efforts began quickly and spurred great economic development and population growth.
In October 1871, dry weather and an abundance of wooden buildings, streets and sidewalks made Chicago vulnerable to fire. The Great Chicago Fire began on the night of October 8, in or around a barn located on the property of Patrick and Catherine O’Leary at 137 DeKoven Street on the city’s southwest side. Legend holds that the blaze started when the family’s cow knocked over a lighted lantern; however, Catherine O’Leary denied this charge, and the true cause of the fire has never been determined. What is known is that the fire quickly grew out of control and moved rapidly north and east toward the city center.
The fire burned wildly throughout the following day, finally coming under control on October 10, when rain gave a needed boost to firefighting efforts. The Great Chicago Fire left an estimated 300 people dead and 100,000 others homeless. More than 17,000 structures were destroyed and damages were estimated at $200 million.
The disaster prompted an outbreak of looting and lawlessness. Companies of soldiers were summoned to Chicago and martial law was declared on October 11, ending three days of chaos. Martial law was lifted several weeks later.
In the given passage, the author's claim isn't supported by strong evidence.
Explanation:
A claim is a statement we make, believing it to be true and correct. It is our main argument. A counterclaim is a statement that represents the opposing argument.
In the given case, the author claims that organizing a film festival every May isn't worth it. They also provide the counterclaim - that the festival should continue, as it is a very popular tourist event and provides a huge source of revenue, which is why local businesses support it.
The evidence that supports this counterargument is the benefit the city and businesses get from the festival. That is objective evidence. The author's claim lacks this sort of evidence. It's based only on their personal feelings - they are bothered by the crowds and mess, while other people may enjoy the festival. It's likely that more people are satisfied than dissatisfied. That is why statement A is correct.
Learn more about claims and counterclaims here: brainly.com/question/1443564
#LearnWithBrainly
To write your evaluation of the writer's argument identify the argument, decide if you agree or disagree, provide evidence to support your position.
Writing a text that evaluates the writer's argument requires multiple steps, and can be quite challenging. Here are the steps you need to follow to successfully do this task.
Read the text and identify the author's or writer's argument about recycled wastewater. For example, the writer's position can be I agree with the use of recycled wastewater because it decreases the water being wasted.
Decide if you agree or disagree with this position based on your personal beliefs, information from other sources, etc.
Write the text evaluating the writer's argument to do this:
- Express your position in a thesis statement.
- Summarize and support the writer's position.
- Support your position using evidence.
- Provide a conclusion.
Note: This question is incomplete because the text it refers to is missing; due to this, I answered it based on general knowledge.
Learn more about personal beliefs in: brainly.com/question/13240775
